IPVV — V2-H ARGUMENT MAP (the pañcamo vimarśa: the reflexive-awareness as the manifestation's nature, and the parā-vāk, kārikās 11–13)

In the manas-cognition (the middle-self, the inner-speech), the first surge — the paśyantī-word-said, of the will-marker — is where the pramātṛ-prameya are not yet separated even by their common form (no distinction-flash). This very thing shines by itself. The reason: if the un-broken pramātṛ-prameya-form (not yet split) were not really manifested, then in the quick reading (the lipi-recitation, the swift motion, the quick speech) — going from line to line, place to place, organ to organ, not re-reflecting the to-be-abandoned and to-be-grasped parts, and the agent of the abandonment/attainment not reflecting — the varied abandonments/attainments would not be (they are seen as re-reflection-preceded; so they infer their cause, the re-reflection). Nor is that re-reflection only by the diffe