ch4_kawajiri_fragments

• w Fragments of the Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti1

• hei Kawajiri

• troduction

• e Pratyabhijñā school is named after the work of Utpaladeva (c.
• 5-75) who is a disciple of Somānanda (c. 900-50), though Somānanda is
• cognized as the founder of the Pratyabhijñā school. According to
• dhurāja (c. 1000-50) who was from south India and travelled to Kashmir
• become a disciple of Abhinavagupta (c. 975–1025), the following works
• e regarded as the authoritative Pratyabhijñā texts:2

• Īśvarapratyabhijñā-kārikā (ĪPK) of Utpaladeva

• Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vr̥tti (ĪPVr̥) of Utpaladeva

• Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti/ṭīkā (ĪPViv) of Utpaladeva

• Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vimarśinī (ĪPV) of Abhinavagupta

• Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti-vimarśinī (ĪPVV) of Abhinavagupta

• e ĪPViv is a commentary on the ĪPK and ĪPVr̥, both of which are written
• the same time. The ĪPV and the ĪPVV are commentaries on the ĪPK and
• e ĪPViv, respectively. Among these, the ĪPViv is only extant in a
• agmentary form. After Torella published an article on the ĪPViv in
• 88, he recently edited a part of the ĪPViv in his articles.3 His
• ition is based on a transcript copied by K.C. Pandey himself and the
• iginal of it. The original manuscript written in Śāradā script (Skt.
• No. 30) was discovered in the National Archives of India, New Delhi.4
• contains the part of the ĪPViv relative to ĪPK1.3.6-1.5.3 and the
• troduction to ĪPK 1.5.4-5.

• present, this is a unique manuscript of the ĪPViv, though so
• agmentary. Except this part of the ĪPViv edited by Torella, one can
• ean some passages of the ĪPViv not only from the works of
• hinavagupta and Kṣemarāja but also from the footnotes of the KSTS
• ition of the ĪPV.5 According to Torella (2007c: 479, fn. 8), those
• otnotes must have been in the margin of a manuscript of the ĪPV, that
• ven the siglum Gh in the edition of the ĪPV.6

• the course of search for the manuscripts of the Pratyabhijñā works, I
• quired photocopies of a manuscript of the ĪPK along with the ĪPVr̥ (ms
• . 4408) kept in the Akhila Bhāratīya Saṁskrit Parishad, Lucknow.7 This
• nuscript is written in Devanāgarī script and contains marginal notes
• re and there. I began examining them. Very soon, I realized that some
• ssages in the margin are from the ĪPViv, by means of collating them
• th the already edited text of the ĪPViv, and expected that there would
• new fragments of the ĪPViv in the margin. With reference to this
• nuscript, it is noteworthy that most of the passages in the margin are
• om the Pratyabhijñā texts. A scribe of this manuscript seems to
• nfine himself to add his own comments.

• this paper, I will present new fragments of the ĪPViv. This paper is
• voted to the diplomatic edition of the new fragments of the ĪPViv
• lative to ĪPK1.1.1-1.5.3.

• itorial signs in the apparatus and the diplomatic edition

• the reading of the edition by Torella

• illegible akṣara(s) or part of an akṣara due, e.g. to blurring

• lacunae in the manuscript

• > contain added akṣara(s) in the manuscript (the position is indicated
• the margin)

• ] contain unclear akṣara(s) or part of an akṣara that is unclear due,
• g., to blurring

• } contain akṣara(s) deleted in the manuscript

• sign of insertion added above the line

• sign of insertion added below the line

• agments Corresponding to Torella’s Edition

• a beginning, we will examine the passages of the ĪPViv in the
• nuscript with the help of the edition of the ĪPViv. Though there are
• so passages from the ĪPV and so on in the margin, they are not given
• re since they are not in question.

• Viv1.3.6:

• r) vyatiriktārthaprakāśanam api jñānānāṁ svarūpam eva na tv arthasya
• py atiśayas tac ca tasya rūpaṁ nānyasya jñānasya svarūpatām eti
• nānyaviviṣaye* nyasyāpīti viṣayamelanaṁ syāt tadā** jñānāni
• ātmamātreti

• enānyaviṣaye T.8

• tad āha T.9

• Torella 1988: 144, ll. 7-10

• Viv1.3.7:

• r) yujyate* punar etādr̥śo vyavahāro yady eṣām anubhavasmr̥tyādīnāṁ
• nmātrasāratvenaika evātmā syād yasyaitā** viśvātmanaḥ parameśvarasya
• ānādikā vicitrāḥ śaktayo nyathā tu na syād ity āha na cetyādi*

• ujyeta T.10

• yasyaiva T.

• *etā jñānādikāḥ T.

• **āha na cetyādi not found in T.11

• Torella 2007a: 477, ll. 20-22

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK 1.3.7. Though,
• Torella pointed out, another part of the ĪPViv which contains the
• pression śaktiyogalakṣaṇaṁ ca seems to be mentioned in the ĪPVV,12 it
• also not found in this fragment. We may say that that part of the
• Viv has not come down to us or occurs in elsewhere.

• r) bhinnāvabhāsinām api cārthānāṁ cidekarūpatve tadviṣayāṇāṁ jñānānām
• ivādasiddham eva tadātmakatvam

• Torella 2007a: 477, ll. 31-32

• v) tad evam ekāṁtarmukhasvasaṁvedanarūpacit-tattvātmatāviśrāntiṁ
• [jñā]nānām* aiṁdriyakānām** apy anyonyaṁ sahabhāvapr̥thagbhāvaprakāśo
• syād ity arthānām api sadasattāniyamaniścayo na syāt tataś ca
• rvavyavahārocchedaprasaṁgaḥ tasmād eṣām ekacittattvaviśrāṁti{ma}rūpam
• usaṁdhānam avaśyābhyupagaṁtavyaṁ tad āha śeṣapadārthajñānā-nām*** iti

• inā jñānānām T.13

• aindriyakāṇām T.14

• *aśeṣapadārthajñānām T.15

• Torella 2007a: 480, ll. 3-7

• v) [. . .]śrāṁti[. . .]saṁdhā[. . .]kaśabdo pi vivr̥taḥ — Torella
• 07a: 480, ll. 7-8

• v) smr̥tir api pūrvāvabhāsitavastunaḥ pūrvāvabhā-sitatvena
• rtamānakāle prakhyāpanaśaktiḥ deśakālaviśeṣāvacchedaśūnyatvena
• citrecchāprati-bodhitāvabhāsabhedavāsanāmātropapāditavi-
• lparūpavikalparūpavijñānā ’pohanaśaktiḥ*
• ṁkita-pratipakṣapratikṣepapatvād** vikalpānāṁ

• icitrecchābodhitā- T,16 -upapāditavikalparūpavijñānā- T.17

• -pratikṣepaparatvād T.18

• Torella 2007a: 480, ll. 14-17

• Viv 1.4.1

• v) smr̥tyādīnām idānīṁ jñānena prakaraṇenānena* svarūpaṁ nirūpayinn**
• eṣakālānugatasvataṁtrā-vabodha-lakṣaṇātmatatvasvabhāveśvaraśaktirūpatāṁ
• atipipādayiṣuḥ smr̥ter eva tāvat suspaṣṭam īśvarātmasiddhihetutayā
• athamaṁ saṁbhavam āha sa hītyādi***

• ñānaprakaraṇenānena T.

• nirūpayiṣyann T.19

• *sa hītyādi not found in T.

• Torella 2007b: 544, ll. 2-5

• is fragment, which gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.1, is
• so found in the footnote 17 of the ĪPV I 115.20

• v) bodhātmano nityatvenaitadavibhaktāyā boddhr̥tāyā nityatve pi
• ttattathānirmitavibhinnadeśakālopasarja- nārthoparāgeṇa
• dhaikarūpasyārthānubhavasyāpi* bhinnakālatvena pūrvapaścādvyavahāraḥ
• d āha paścād apīti ।।

• odhaikarūpasyārthānubhavasyāpi ca T.

• Torella 2007b: 544, ll. 11-14

• th reference to the part of tattatathānirmita-, Torella points out
• at Abhinavagupta seems to have a partly different text. However, this
• agment accords with the text edited by Torella.21

• v) anubhavasmaraṇakālavyāpitvaṁ sa parato pi sann iti sūtre nirdiṣṭaṁ
• vivr̥taṁ ca paścād api pūrvānu-bhūtārthānubhavitr̥tvād iti ।।

• Torella 2007b: 545, ll. 17-18

• Viv 1.4.2

• r) smr̥tivikalparūpaparāmarśasamaye deśakālādy-avacchedavat*tathā
• taḥsthitasya vahir api tad idam ityādisarvanāmanirdeśasyārthasya**
• marthyād eva prakāśo bhavatīty āha bhāsayec cetyādi*** ।।

• eśakālādyavacchedāt T.

• -nirdeśyasyārthasya T.22

• *bhāsayec cetyādi not found in T.

• Torella 2007b: 546, ll. 1-3

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.2. The
• ading deśakālādyavacchedāt is to be corrected to
• śa-kālādyavacchedavat- as given in this fragment, which is supported
• the ĪPVV.23 Also, it seems to me that va just before
• tathāntaḥsthitasya is dropped or blurred and only ā-diacritical mark
• left.

• r) prakāśasvabhāvaś ca parāmarśo yathāsau tasyāvaśyaṁ prakāśamānatayā*
• āvyam anyathā parāmarśanam eva nopapadyeta ’to tra nāsti vivādaḥ

• vaśyaṁ prakāśanena tathā T.

• Torella 2007b: 546, ll. 14-16

• r) sūtre liṅartho niyogakaraṇalakṣaṇe vivr̥taḥ

• Torella 2007b: 546, ll. 16-17

• r) [ke]valaṁ yad yathā parāmr̥śyate tat tathaivāva-bhāsyate smr̥tau ca
• rvaprakāśitasya parāmarśāt pūrvaprakāśitatvenaivābhāsas tad āhānyathā
• akāśitasya parāmarśo na kr̥taḥ syād iti eṣa eva cānubhūtāsaṁpra-mauṣaḥ*

• ānubhūtaviṣayāsampramoṣaḥ T.

• Torella 2007b: 546, l. 17; 547, l. 1

• r) pūrvaprakāśitatvaṁ ca pūrvātītadeśakālapramātrā-
• raviśeṣāvacchedenaiva prakāśanād bhavati tad āha svasattākāla eva ceti
• ।।

• Torella 2007b: 547, l. 1; 547, l. 2

• r)++++[tvāc ca bhogava]śena* smr̥t{i}āv upajāya**++++++++++sasyaiva
• ṁcanādyābhā-sāsaṁ***+++++++++++payogaṁ
• rva-deśakālābhyā**++++++++++āt svalakṣaṇarūpasya smara+++++++sphuṭo
• v avabhāso bhavati tad āha kadācit tv iti ।। 25

• bhogavaśena T.24

• upajātāyāṁ T.25

• **kāṁcanādyābhāsāsambhinnasya- T.26)

• **pūrvadeśakālābhāsādi- T.

• Torella 2007b: 547, ll. 14-17

• r) yadā punar arthitāvaśenaiva sadghaṭakāṁcana-lohitatvādyābhāsa{s tad
• a}saṁvedanenaiva pūrva-dikkālādyābhāsasaṁbhedina* evārthāsya smaraṇaṁ
• dā sphuṭa evāvabhāsas** tad āhānyadā tv iti ।।

• pūrvadikkālābhāsasaṁbhedinaḥ T.

• evābhāsaḥ T.

• Torella 2007b: 548, ll. 5-7

• r) kadācit punar atyaṁtaikarasāvadhānodyuktasya*
• ravaśeṣaviśeṣaṇāvabhāsasāmānādhikaranyāpattiviṣa- dīkr̥tasmaryamāṇo
• haḥ sākṣātkārasamaya iva* sphuṭaṁ puraḥ sphurati tad
• ātiśayetyādi** ।।25

• atyantaikarasāvadhānodyuktasya T.27)

• -viśadīkr̥taḥ smaryamāṇaḥ T.

• *sākṣātkāramaya eva T.

• **atiśayanirantara iti T.

• Torella 2007b: 548, ll. 7-10

• is fragment of the ĪPViv is quoted in the footnote 67 of the ĪPV I
• 5.28 It is to be noted that it has the reading sākṣātkārasamaya iva
• stead of the reading sākṣātkāramaya eva which the text edited by
• rella as well as the footnote of the edition of the ĪPV has.29

• Viv 1.4.3

• r) anubhavakāle* ca pūrvakālāvacchedenārthābhāsasya samarthitasya
• rtamānikasmr̥tiprakāśād** bhedo nopapadyate ity anubhavasmr̥tyābhāsayoḥ
• rīrībhūta eko rthas tayor apy ekatvam*** ākṣipatīti copadarśayan
• aṣṭāraṁ* kartāraṁ caikam upapādayati na cetiyādi** 25

• mr̥tikāle T.30

• *vārtamānikasmr̥tiprakāśāt T.31)

• **ekatvam T.32)

• **draṣṭāraṁ T.33

• ***smartāram T.34

• **na cetyādi not found in T.

• Torella 2007c: 479, ll. 2-5

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.3.

• r) smr̥tiś ca jñānarūpaivety āha smr̥tiprakāśa iti — Torella 2007c: 479,
• 16

• r) smr̥tiprakāśasya tātkālikatvaviśeṣaṇena vartamānatoktyā
• ladvayānusaṁdhānāt smartr̥siddhir upakṣiptā 26

• Torella 2007c: 479, l. 16; 480, l. 1

• v) ādigrahaṇenotprekṣādisaṁvid uktā 1 — Torella 2007c: 480, l. 10

• Viv 1.4.4

• v) na ca prakāśamānatānyathānupapatyā prakāś-ānupraveśe pi ghaṭavad
• āhyāṁśāvasthānaṁ pūrvānubhavasya grāhikāṁśopāroheṇa* prathanād ity āha
• ivetyādi** ।। 27

• rāhakāṁśopāroheṇa T.

• naivetyādi not found in T.

• Torella 2007c: 481, ll. 3-5

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.4.

• v) smaraṇajñāne ghaṭādyarthākāra eva ekaḥ pūrvakālādyavacchinno
• āhyabhāvasthaḥ pr̥thaktvenedaṁtānirdeśe* vabhāti na tu
• rvānu-bhavākāro parasmr̥tāv iti** na cāsau yogino
• rthārtha-mātrajñāna*** iva pūrvānubhavo naiva prakāśate
• aṁkārāspadībhūtagrāhakāṁśānupraviṣṭasyāham* anubhūvaṁ**
• yānubhūto rtha iti vā pūrvānubhavasya smartr̥bodhaikhyena prakāśanāt 27

• dantānirdeśyo T.

• aparaḥ smr̥tāv iti T.35

• *atītārthamātrajñāne T.

• *-grāhakāṁśā- T.36)

• ***anvabhūvam iti T.37

• Torella 2007c: 481, ll. 11-16

• v) vedyatātra prathamānatātātparyeṇoktā na tv anyā-yattaprakāśatvena*
• danakarmatayā

• a tv anyāyattaprakāratvena T.

• Torella 2007c: 481, ll. 26-27

• e reading anyāyattaprakāratvena is to be corrected to
• yāyattaprakāśatvena as given in this fragment.

• Viv 1.4.5

• v) nanu prakāśānupraveśaṁ vinā prakāśamānatā mā bhūn na tu tāvataiva
• akāśyaprakāśakayor aikyāpattir grāhyabhāge eva grāhakād vicchinne
• aṭādeḥ prakāśyasya prakāśābhinnasyāpi prathanāt tathā ca* yogināṁ
• rapramātr̥bodhaḥ paratvenaivedaṁtayā prakāśate nyathā bhrāṁtiḥ syāt tat
• thaṁ jñānasya jñānāṁtaragrāhyatve nubhavaviṣayāyāḥ smr̥ter aikyaṁ*
• ād iti । āha yoginām iti । 28

• athā T.

• *jñānāntaragrāhyatve T.38)

• *smr̥ter anubhavena sahaikyam T.

• Torella 2007c: 481, l. 28 - 482, l. 4

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.5.

• v) tad atra yoginām api parabodhaḥ svasaṁvinmaya evāvabhāsate nyathā
• āguktarītyā* bodhatāhāniḥ syāt ।।

• rāguktanītyā T.39

• Torella 2007c: 482, ll. 12-13

• v) pramātraṁtaragatāḥ pramātrantarasthitāḥ-pramātraṁtarātmānas
• ttadghaṭapaṭādi-bhinnabhāvaviṣayā* ity arthaḥ jñānānām
• ānāṁtaravedyatve svabhāvahāniḥ syād iti svabhāvapadam upāttaṁ nāpy
• hayavedyateti pratipādanāya mātragrahaṇam ।। 28

• ghaṭādi- T.

• Torella 2007c: 482, ll. 19-22

• v) tad evaṁ sarvathā jñānānāṁ vedyavedakabhāvo*
• āhakabhāvenaikyāpattyā** svaparavibhāgasaṁskāra-bhraṁśe pi vastutaḥ
• asaṁvedanarūpatayaiva bhavatīti*** sthitam 29 ।।

• a vedyavedakabhāvaḥ T.40

• grāhakabhāvaikyāpattyā T.

• *bhavanti T.41

• Torella 2007c: 484, ll. 13-15

• r) vāstavena tu bodhaikātmanā pramāṇāṁtareṇaikyāpattir* eva
• ramātmavedanaṁ** sarvajñasya tad āha yoginām paramātmatāpattir
• eti***

• odhaikātmanā pramātrā pramātrantaraikyāpattiḥ T.42

• paramātmavedakatvaṁ T.43

• *parātmatāpattir eva iti T.44

• Torella 2007c: 483, ll. 21-23

• r) pramāṇāṁtaragatasaṁbaṁdhi*śarīrabuddhyākārot-tīrṇena bodhamātreṇa**
• aṁtāparatvena***

• atpramātrantarasambandhi- T.

• bodhamātreṇātmanā T.

• *idantayā paratvena T.

• Torella 2007c: 484, ll. 17-18

• r) eṣa ca pakṣo noktanayena saṁbhavati ity abhyupagama-vādamātram
• edaṁ tad āha yadi tathā saṁbhaved iti

• Torella 2007c: 484, ll. 19-21

• Viv 1.4.6

• r) yāpīdaṁtayaivānubhavaparāmarśakāriṇī smr̥tir udeti sāpi
• avahāramātreṇa tathārūpā na tu vastusthityeti darśayann āha smaryate
• yādi*

• maryate ityādi not found in T.

• Torella 2007d: 929, ll. 4-5

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK 1.4.6.45

• r) yat punas tad etādr̥śaṁ darśanaṁ mamāsīd iti tadahaṁkārāspadasyaiva
• sya darśanasya* svarūpa-viśeṣakhyāpanāya** tathā vyākhyānaṁ yathā yo
• v ahaṁ-pratītimātraviṣaya ātmā sa nitya iti

• adahaṅkārāspadasyaiva taddarśanopasarjanam T.46

• dr̥ṣṭa ity eva svarūpaviśeṣakhyāpanāya T.

• Torella 2007d: 930, ll. 3-5

• Viv 1.4.7

• v) pra+++++dr̥ṣṭapātināpi parāmarśena darśana-syāhaṁkārāspadasyaiva
• rāmarśa ity āha yā cetyādi*

• ā cetyādi not found in T

• Torella 2007d: 930, ll. 12-13

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.4.7.47 This
• agment of the ĪPViv is quoted in the footnote 141 of the ĪPV I 142.

• v) pratyakṣīkārasamaye ca kadācid darśanaṁ paśyāmīti svanāmnopādīyate
• dācid dr̥ṣṭa-syedaṁtādirdeśenaivobhayatrāpi* cātrāsmaccha-bdenaiva
• rśanaparāmarśaḥ ahaṁ paśyāmīty asmaddr̥kchabdaprayogaṁ** vināpi ghaṭo
• m ity ahaṁkārāroheṇa*** darśanaparāmarśo sty evānyathā
• aṭasyedaṁtāpratyakṣatvaṁ** kathaṁ parāmr̥śyeta pratyakṣatvaṁ hy
• thasyāhaṁkāragocaro ta eva tad āha puraḥsthitārtheti*
• amātr̥mayam iti ca ।।

• dantānirdeśenaiva । ubhayatrāpi T.48

• asmacchabdaprayogam T.

• *ahaṅkāreṇa T.

• **ghaṭasyedantayā pratyakṣatvam T.

• ***arthasya ahaṅkāragocaro ’nubhava eva T.

• **puraḥsthita iti T.

• Torella 2007d: 931, ll. 1-5

• part of this fragment is quoted in the footnote 148 of the ĪPV I
• 3.49

• Viv 1.4.8

• v) arthamātraparāmarśena smr̥tiḥ sa iti — Torella 2007d: 932, ll. 1-2

• v) grāhakasya tāvad ahaṁkārabhāga eva prathā grāhyasyāpi
• akāśātmatāsāratvenaiva prakāśamānatā ghaṭate nānyatheti — Torella
• 07d: 932, ll. 4-6

• v) mauliko vicchedas tu mayīyaḥ tad āha māyā-kr̥tavicchinnetyādi* ।।

• āyākr̥tavicchedāv iti T.50 — Torella 2007d: 932, ll. 7-8

• Viv 1.5.3

• r) prakāśamānatā evārthasya siddhiḥ sā ca prakāśa eva tasya cārthād
• ede ghaṭasya prakāśaḥ paṭasyāpi syād ity āha bhinne ityādi* ।।

• hinne ityādi not found in T — Torella 2007d: 937, ll. 1-2

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.5.3.

• Viv 1.5.4-5

• v) atha mataṁ vicitraghaṭapaṭādyābhāsakramasyaika-
• ridr̥śyamānabodhamātrah[e]tutvāyoge* nyathānupa-pattyā vāhyo rthaḥ**
• atyakṣato pi sidhyed ity āha tattad ityādi***

• ābhāsasyaikaparidr̥śyamāna- T.51

• bāhyārthaḥ T.

• *tattad ityādi not found in T. — Torella 2007d: 938, ll. 10-11

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.5.4-5.

• w Fragments

• we have seen, there are a number of passages of the ĪPViv in the
• rgin of the manuscript kept in the Akhila Bhāratīya Sanskrit Parishad.
• w let us turn to the marginal notes which are not identified with
• ready edited texts of the Pratyabhijñā works.

• e words underlined in the text are those literally cited or
• raphrased in the ĪPVV.

• v) svātmani mahe???? svātmanaḥ ka???svabhā[vasy?]papadyamānapar[ā]
• na pra[??]kr̥tasiddhivi??bhāvaḥ ??taḥ । kartarīti yuddhas? nī??lakṣaṇaṁ
• rtr̥??prathanaṁ nirdiṣṭaṁ yaj jñātr̥??yām apy anugatam
• ya??ni??tr̥tārūpā kartr̥tāpaś??lliśet sāpi ??ṣani śa??tr̥śatr̥no pā??vayo
• ̥?i??tmikāyāḥ pradarśanena

• my knowledge, this fragment does not come from any specific
• atyabhijñā work. It seems to give some comments on ĪPK1.1.2-3.52

• v) bhātabhāsamānarūpānusaṁdhānātmikā pratyabhijñā ।

• is fragment that gives a definition of recognition seems to be from
• e ĪPV, though not exactly.53

• v) tasmād īśvare kārakavyāpāraḥ pramāṇavyāpāraś cānupayuktaḥ

• r) paratra jñātr̥tvānumāpi kā

• r) nanv ity ākṣepe ātmano jñānakriyāyogaiśvaryam ātmaiva tu nāsty
• upalaṁbhād ahaṁpratyayenāpi śarīrādyatirekeṇānyasyā pratīter ity āha
• ipann āha nanv ityādi

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.2.1-2, which is
• pported by the ĪPVV.54 However, the reading nanv ity ākṣepe is from
• e ĪPV.55

• r) ātmano jñānakriyāyogād aiśvaryam ātmaiva tu nāsty anupalaṁbhād
• aṁpratyayenāpi śarīrādyatirekeṇānyasyā pratītir ity ākṣipann āha nanv
• i ।।

• rangely, this fragment gives the same avataraṇikā as the above.

• r) avikalpake rūpaṁ etadvyatiriktasya anubhavituḥ saṁbaṁdhi

• is fragment seems to be from the ĪPV.56

• r) nanu aham iti śabdena kiṁ vikalpyate ।

• r) nanv arthānubhavasaṁskārajatvāt smr̥tes tadanubhavāpāye pi
• dviṣayeṇaiva viṣayavattābhīṣṭāv ātmopagamo vyartha ity āha
• traivetyādi

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.2.4cd,57 which
• supported by the ĪPVV.58 Here the reading pūrvārthānubhava- instead
• arthānubhava- is suggested in the ĪPVV.

• r) tad evaṁ saṁskāramātrāt smr̥tyudgame siddhe nityatvād ātmanaḥ
• ṁskārodayānudayayor avaicitryād kiṁcitkaratve kalpanāmātram etad
• aṣṭāyaṁ sthirā ātmā nāma sattā cety āha tata ityādi ।।

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.2.6, which is
• pported by the ĪPVV.59

• v) anyā ca vr̥ttiḥ pariṇāmāt pariṇāmo hi pūrvasvabhā-vatirodhānenaiva
• thā ghaṭasya kāpālānivr̥ttis tu tasyaiva rūpasyāpratyastamitasya yathā
• ūtenaiva parāmr̥śamānasya yathā tathā vattena tadyathā devadattasya
• mana ghaṭasyodakāharaṇaṁ tadvr̥ttibhedānutattvabhedo bhavati tenaiva
• peṇāvādhitapratyajñāviṣayatvāt iti ca nr̥pativārtikaṭīkāyām ।।

• is fragment is from the Nr̥pativārtikaṭīkā which does not seem to have
• me down to us. The text, beginning with tadvr̥ttibhedā- and ending with
• iṣayatvāt, is found in the footnote 3 of the KSTS edition of the
• vadr̥ṣṭi.60

• v) ātmano jñānasya ca bodharūpatvāviśeṣe dvitvakalpanānupapannety āha
• ānaṁ cetyādi

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.2.7, which is
• pported by the ĪPVV.61

• v) jaḍo py asāv ity amathasya prakāśo bhavatīti sāṁkhyamatam āśaṁkate
• sāṁkhy{ī}o yam abhijñānaṁ buddhivr̥ttirūpaṁ pūrvavad eva nopapannam
• y āha athārthasyetyādi ।।

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.2.8, which is
• pported by the ĪPVV.62 The reading sāṁkhyo ’yam api instead of sāṁkhyo
• am abhi- is suggested in the ĪPVV.

• v) ataḥ pariṇāmād ayam anyo vr̥ttiśabdasyārthaḥ
• igalitasvarūpasatattvasyaiva bhānasya dharma-kalparūpāṁtarachāyā
• āraṇaṁ ghaṭasyevodakāharaṇaṁ caitrasyaiva gamanaṁ vr̥ttir ucyate
• riṇāmas tu svarūpāṁtarapattir eveti nr̥pativārtikaṭīkāyām ।।

• is fragment is also from the Nr̥pativārtikaṭīkā. The text, beginning
• th avigalitasvarūpa- and ending with vr̥ttir ucyate, is quoted in the
• otnote 3 of the KSTS edition of the Śivadr̥ṣṭi.63

• r) evaṁ kalākārayor api jñeyam ।।

• v) kārikopapattim āha

• v) jaḍatvena viṣayasya kiṁcit kr̥taṁ

• r) nanu kenaivam uktaṁ jaḍo dhyavasāyaḥ saṁvitsvabhāvo hy asau
• ānāvyatirekāt tad āha cidrūpo pīti

• is fragment seems to give the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.3.5cd.
• is noteworthy that this fragment is found in the footnote 21 of the
• V I 102, in which the reading cidrūpo ’pīti64 is replaced by tata
• yādi.65

• r) jñānāni svarūpamātrapariniṣṭhitāni anyonyarūpā- saṁsparśāt tataś ca
• amopajātatattadvicitraviṣayasaṁ-
• tsaṁtānamelanopapadyamānapravr̥ttiviṣayā
• havi-śeṣaniścayābhāvenārthakriyālābho rthināṁ na syād iti
• kavyavahāroccheda ity āha evam ityādi ।।

• is fragment gives the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to ĪPK1.3.6, which is
• pported by the ĪPVV.66

• r) svātmani abhinne sati padārthānāṁ bhedāvedanāt

• r) svapratipattiḥ prakhyā paratra tatpratipādanaṁ upākhyā

• ncluding Remark

• have seen:

• in the manuscript of the ĪPK preserved in Lucknow, a number of
• cerpts from the ĪPViv are found;

• new fragments of the ĪPViv are found;

• they are mainly from the avataraṇikā of the ĪPViv to the ĪPK; and

• with reference to the part of the ĪPViv edited by Torella, the
• agments of this manuscript give not only the avataraṇikā but also part
• the commentary for the ĪPK and ĪPVr̥.

• is true that a part of the text of the ĪPViv has been transmitted in
• rth Indian manuscripts, but it is unlikely that the full text of the
• Viv has been transmitted there. At least, the scribe of this
• nuscript did not have it. For, if he had known of it, he would have
• ven the part of the commentary for the ĪPK as well as the avataraṇikā
• the ĪPViv with reference to the part of the ĪPViv which are not
• ited.

• vertheless, what is important here is that we can glean the new
• agments of the ĪPViv from this manuscript. We should notice the
• rginal notes of this manuscript not only from the aspect of gleaning
• em but also from the aspect of the manuscript transmission of the
• atyabhijñā texts. It is urgent that we should examine the rest of the
• rginal notes in this manuscript.

• bliography

• xts

• K = Utpaladeva, Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā (see Torella 2002).

• V = Abhinavagupta, Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī, ed. Mukund Ram
• astri, vols. I-II, KSTS XXII, XXXIII, Bombay, 1918-21.

• Viv = Utpaladeva, Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti/ṭīkā.

• Vr̥ = Utpaladeva, Īśvarapratyabhijñāvr̥tti (see Torella 2002).

• VV = Abhinavagupta, Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivr̥tivimarśinī, ed. Madhusudan
• ul Shastri, vols. I-III, KSTS LX, LXII, LXV, Bombay, 1938-43.

• TS = Kashmir Series of Texts and Studies.

• = Somānanda, Śivadr̥ṣṭi, ed. Madhusudan Kaul Shastri, KSTS LIV, Poona,
• 34.

• anslations and studies

• rella, Raffaele, 1988, “A Fragment of Utpaladeva’s
• varapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti”, East and West, 38: 137-74.

• —, 2002, The Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s
• ̥tti. Critical Edition and Annotated Translation, 2nd edn., Delhi:
• tilal Banarsidass. [1st edn. Serie Orientale Roma 71, Roma: Istitute
• aliano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1994.]

• —, 2007a, “Studies on Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti — Part I:
• upalabdhi and Apoha in a Śaiva Garb”, in Expanding and Merging
• rizons: Contributions to South Asian and Cross-Cultural Studies in
• mmemoration of Wilhelm Halbfass, ed. K. Preisendanz, Vienna, pp.
• 3-90.

• —, 2007b, “Studies on Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti — Part
• : What is Memory?”, in Indica et Tibetica. Festschrift für Michael
• hn zum 65. Geburtstag von Freunden und Shülern überreicht, ed. Klaus
• nrad and Hartmann, Jens-Uwe, Wien, pp. 539-63.

• —, 2007c, “Studies on Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti — Part
• I: Can a cognition become the object of another cognition?”, in
• langes tantriques à la mémoire d’Hélène Brunner, ed. D. Goodall and A.
• doux, Pondicherry, pp. 475-84.

• —, 2007d, “Studies on Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti — Part
• : Light of the subject, light of the object”, in Pramāṇakīrtiḥ: Papers
• dicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th Birthday,
• rt 2, ed. B. Kellner, H. Krasser, H. Lasic, M.T. Much and H. Tauscher,
• en, pp. 925-39.

• —, 2009, “Variazioni Kashmire sul Tema della Percezione dello Yogin
• ogipratyakṣa)”, Rivista degli Studi Orientali, LXXXI: 35-58.

• —, 2012, “Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivr̥ti — Part V:
• lf-Awareness and Yogic Perception”, in Devadattīyam: Johannes
• onkhorst Felicitation Volume, ed. Francois Voegeli, Vincent
• tshinger, Danielle Feller, Maria Piera Candotti, Bogdan Diaconescu and
• hlar Kulkarn, Bern, pp. 275-300.

• his research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS
• llows.)

• ----------------------------------------------------------------------

• I would like to thank the Akhila Bhāratīya Saṁskrit Parishad for
• lowing me to take copies of a manuscript used in this paper. I am very
• ateful to Prof. Raffaele Torella for encouraging me to undertake this
• rk. My special thanks are due to Prof. David Peter Lawrence who kindly
• rrected my English.

• Śāstraparāmarśa 4: sūtraṁ vr̥ttir vivr̥tir laghvī br̥haty ubhe
• marśinyau । prakaraṇavivaraṇapañcakam iti śāstraṁ pratyabhijñāyāḥ ।।
• orella 1988: 137: Five commentaries on the Treatise [the Śivadr̥ṣṭi]
• nstitute the corpus of the authoritative Pratyabhijñā texts and these
• e the sūtra [ĪPK], the vr̥tti, the vivr̥ti and the two vimarśinīs the
• ng one [ĪPVV] and the short one [ĪPV].)

• See Torella 2007a, etc. See Appendix I and II.

• For further details of this manuscript, see Torella 2007a.

• They are sometimes introduced by the expression yathoktam
• ṭasāhasryām.

• This manuscript is now preserved in the National Archives of India,
• w Delhi (Skt. ms No. 5).

• For a critical edition of the ĪPK, this manuscript is not used by
• rella. See Torella 2002: xlvi-liv.

• -viviṣaye in this fragment is a scribal error for -viṣaye.

• In this fragment, an akṣara ha after tadā seems to be dropped.

• Torella follows Abhinavagupta’s reading, though the manuscript of the
• Viv as well as this fragment has the reading yujyate. See ĪPVV I 273,
• . 6-7: tad etat tātparyam avatāraṇikāyām āha yujyeta iti hetuhetumator
• ṅā ।

• na cetyādi in this fragment should be corrected to na ced ityādi,
• cause ĪPK1.3.7 begins with na cet. See ĪPK1.3.7: na ced
• taḥkr̥tānantaviśvarūpo maheśvaraḥ । syād ekaś cidvapur
• ānasmr̥tyapohanaśaktimān ।।

• See ĪPVV I 273, l. 14: nāpi tatsvarūpātiriktā dharmadharmibhāvena
• raṁ vartamānā ity āha śaktiyogalakṣaṇaṁ ca iti ।

• An akṣara nā after vi seems to be dropped.

• aindriyakānām in this fragment is a scribal error for aindriyakāṇām.

• śeṣapadārthajñānānām in this fragment should be emended to
• eṣapadārthajñānām,

• According to Torella (2007a: 480 fnn. 38, 39), the footnote 71 of the
• V I 110 is based on a marginal note found in one of the manuscripts of
• e ĪPV which is used for the KSTS edition. The text as quoted in the
• V manuscript has vicitrecchāprabodhitā-, while this fragment does
• citrecchāpratibodhitā-.

• -vikalparūpavikalparūpa- is a scribal error for -vikalparūpa-.

• -pratikṣepapatvāt is a scribal error for -pratikṣepaparatvāt.

• nirūpayinn is a scribal error for nirūpayiṣyann.

• The text as quoted in the footnote 17 of the ĪPV I 115 has
• ānaprakaraṇenānena.

• Or, it may be that, in the ĪPVV, Abhinavagupta analysed tattat in
• ttattathānirmita- into tena te, and then said in other words, namely,
• dhena and anubhūyamānāḥ. If so, tattat does not mean “various”, but
• objects] which are being directly perceived (anubhūyamāna) by
• rception (bodha).” See ĪPVV II 5, ll. 10-14: tena iti bodhena । te iti
• ubhūyamānāḥ । tathā iti svarūpād avibhaktā api
• dhasvātantryaprakāreṇa nirmitavibhaktatām iva āpāditāḥ, ata eva
• citraṁ kr̥tvā bhinnā bodhāc ca anyonyaṁ ca tata eva deśakālaviśeṣaṇā ye
• thāḥ, taiḥ prakāśamānair yaḥ uparāgaḥ, tena hetunā . . . । — See
• rella 2007b: 544, fn 18

• Torella corrects -nirdeśasya in the manuscript of the ĪPViv to
• irdeśyasya, which is supported by the ĪPVV. In the ĪPVV, Abhinavagupta
• raphrases nirdeśya as parāmr̥śya. See ĪPVV II 19, ll. 9-10: ata eva tad
• y anena vapuṣā parāmr̥śyo yo ’rthaḥ, tasya sāmarthyād iti . . . ।

• See ĪPVV II 19, ll. 7-9: smr̥tirūpaparāmarśe
• rvakāla-deśādyavacchedavān so ’rtho ’ntar iti indriyabhūmim atikramya
• hito ’pi bahir iti saṁvidbhāgāt vyatiriktatvena ahantāvibhaktaḥ . . .

• Both the manuscript of the ĪPViv and this fragment have the reading
• oga-. However, as Torella pointed out, the detailed comments of
• hinavagupta refer to the reading ābhoga-. See ĪPVV II 25, ll. 20-23: ā
• mantāt bhogaḥ saṁvedanāntarbruḍitānantabhāvasaṁskāramadhyanimagnasya
• dbhāvasya unmeṣanātmakapālanacarvaṇavyāpāro ’nveṣaṇātmā, ābhōgaś
• ntāsantatilakṣaṇaṁ prāṇidhānam ।

• The footnote 62 of the ĪPV I 124 reads as follows: yathoktaṁ
• dhyapratyabhijñāyāṁ arthitāvaśāt smr̥tāv upajāyamānāyāṁ
• aṭādyābhāsasyaiva kāñcanādyābhāsasaṁbhinnasyāpi yathopayogaṁ
• rvadeśakālādyābhāsādyavacchedoparāgāt svalakṣaṇarūpasya smaraṇād asāv
• abhāso bhavati iti, svalakṣaṇe tu tatrāvabhāsonmeṣa eva kathita iti na
• ścid virodha iti । The text Torella edited is as follows: arthitvāc ca
• hogavaśena smr̥tāv upajātāyāṁ ghaṭādyābhāsasyaiva
• ñcanādyābhāsāsambhinnasyāpi yathopayogaṁ
• rvadeśakālābhāsādyavacchedoparāgāt svalakṣaṇarūpasya smaraṇād asphuṭo
• āv avabhāso bhavati । tad āha kadācit tu iti । With regard to
• ajātāyām/upajāyamānāyām, this fragment seems to have the reading
• ajāyamānāyām. See Torella 2007b: 547, fn. 44.

• Torella corrects -sambhinnasyāpi in the manuscript of the ĪPViv to
• sambhinnasyāpi, which is supported by this fragment. See Torella
• 07b: 547, fn. 46.

• Torella’s conjectural emendation for -ādhāna- in the manuscript of
• e ĪPViv is supported by this fragment.

• It reads as follows: yathoktam aṣṭasahasryām kadācit punar
• yantaikarasādhānodyuktasya
• ravaśeṣaviśeṣaṇāvabhāsasāmā-nādhikaraṇyāpattiviśadīkr̥taḥ smaryamāṇo
• thaḥ sākṣātkāramaya eva sphuṭam puraḥ sphurati . . .

• See ĪPVV II 29, ll. 13-15: tāṁ vyācaṣṭe kadācit iti sākṣātkārasamaye
• vadbhir ābhāsaiḥ pūrṇo ’rthaḥ pratyabhāsiṣṭa, tāvadbhir eva smaryate
• dā ।

• The reading smr̥tikāle is Torella’s conjectural emendation for
• ūtakāle in the manuscript of the ĪPViv. This conjectural emendation is
• pported by the ĪPVV. See ĪPVV II 33, l. 13: tad avatārayati saṁkṣepeṇa
• r̥tikāle ca iti ।

• The reading vārtamānika- is Torella’s conjectural emendation for
• numānika- in the manuscript of the ĪPViv. This conjectural emendation
• supported by this fragment.

• The reading ekatvam is Torella’s conjectural emendation for ekataram
• the manuscript of the ĪPViv. This conjectural emendation is supported
• this fragment.

• praṣṭāram is a scribal error for draṣṭāram.

• The reading smartāraṁ is Torella’s conjectural emendation for
• rtāraṁ in the manuscript of the ĪPViv. This fragment has the reading
• rtāram.

• The reading aparaḥ is Torella’s conjectural emendation for apara- in
• e manuscript of the ĪPViv. This fragment has the same reading apara-
• the manuscript of the ĪPViv.

• The reading -grāhakāṁśā- is Torella’s emendation for -grāhakāṁ cā- in
• e manuscript of the ĪPViv. This emendation is supported by this
• agment.

• The reading iti is Torella’s conjectural addition. anubhūvam is a
• ribal error for anvabhūvam.

• The reading jñānāntaragrāhyatve is Torella’s conjectural emendation
• r jñānāntarāgrāhyatve in the manuscript of the ĪPViv. This conjectural
• endation is supported by this fragment.

• The reading prāguktanityā which Torella’s edition has, being a simple
• po, is corrected to prāguktanītyā as given in the ĪPVV. See ĪPVV II
• , ll. 22–24: prāguktanītyā iti dr̥k svābhāsaiva . . . । (ĪPK1.3.2)
• yādyuktenanyāyena ।

• In Torella 2007c: 484, Torella had made two emendations (addition of
• before vedyavedakabhāvo; bhavanti instead of bhavati). However, these
• endations are withdrawn in Torella 2012: 295, fn. 58.

• Subsequently, Torella 2012: 295, fn. 58 has adopted the reading
• avatīti.

• pramātrā, not found in the manuscript of the ĪPViv, is restored by
• rella.

• The reading -vedakatvam is Torella's conjectural emendation for
• edanam in the manuscript of the ĪPViv. See ĪPVV II 47, ll. 10-11:
• ttvam iti vivr̥ṇoti paramātmavedakam ity anena । tattvaṁ
• ramātmavedakatvam ity arthaḥ ।

• Changing his view with respect to Torella 2007c, Torella is convinced
• at the reading parātmatāpattir eva iti is the correct one. See Torella
• 12: 290, fn. 43.

• Abhinavagupta seems to have a partly different text which contains
• vat. Or, the text Abhinavagupta had in front of him may have had the
• ading yāvat instead of yāpī- found in the manuscript of the ĪPViv and
• is fragment. See ĪPVV II 53, l. 17: yāvat iti yadety arthaḥ ।

• The reading taddarśanopasarjanam is Torella’s tentative restoration
• r tasya darśanasya in the manuscript of the ĪPViv.

• See ĪPV I 142, fn. 141: idam atra punaḥ saṁkṣepeṇa tātparyam
• atyakṣadr̥ṣṭapātināpi parāmarśena darśanasyāhaṁkārāspadasyaiva
• rāmarśa iti ।

• The reading idantādirdeśenaiva found in this fragment is a scribal
• ror for idantānirdeśenaiva. The edition of the ĪPVV has the reading
• antānirdeśena vā. See ĪPVV II 55, ll. 8–9: idantānirdeśena vā iti
• rśanaṁ prarāmr̥śyate [sic] iti saṁbandhaḥ ।

• See ĪPV I 143, fn. 148: ahaṁ paśyāmi iti hi asmacchabdaprayogaṁ
• nāpi iti ।

• If Utpaladeva quotes the ĪPVr̥ here, the reading māyākr̥tavicchedāv iti
• ould be corrected to māyākr̥tavicchinnetyādi given in this fragment. It
• , however, to be noted that Abhinavagupta seems to have a partly
• fferent text of the ĪPVr̥ which reads māyākr̥tavicchedau instead of
• yākr̥tavicchināvabhāsau. See ĪPVr̥ 1.4.8: . . .
• yākr̥tavicchinnāvabhāsāv api prakāśete ।। and ĪPVV II 62, ll. 19-20:
• nu māyākr̥tavicchedāv iti yad uktaṁ, tena bhagavata eva māyāyogāt
• linyaṁ syāt ।

• Though Torella had given the reading -ābhāsasyaikaparidr̥śyamāna- in
• rella 2007d, he kindly informed me (personal communication, 19 August
• 13) that his manuscript did have the reading
• bhāsakramasyaikaparidr̥śyamāna-. In fact, Abhinavagupta seems to have
• e reading -ābhāsakramasyaikaparidr̥śyamāna- instead of
• bhāsasyaikaparidr̥śyamāna-. See ĪPVV II 82: tam avatārayati atha matam
• i । etat cet ity asya vyākhyānaṁ bhāvisūtrārthaparyantasparśi
• ākhyeyam । vicitraśabdena tattad iti vyākhyātam, kramaśabdena
• asmikatvam ।

• See ĪPK1.1.2-3: kartari jñātari svātmany ādisiddhe maheśvare ।
• aḍātmā niṣedhaṁ vā siddhiṁ vā vidadhīta kaḥ ।। kiṁtu mohavaśād asmin
• ̥ṣṭe ’py anupalakṣite । śaktyāviṣkaraṇeneyaṁ pratyabhijñopadarśyate ।।

• See ĪPV I 20: pratyabhijñā ca bhātabhāsamānarūpā-nusaṁdhān-ātmikā ।

• See ĪPVV I 113: ātmanaḥ ityādinā dharmiṇaṁ hetuṁ vyavahāryatvena
• dhyaṁ ca bruvatā padatrayeṇa siddhāntimataṁ pūrvapakṣavādī dūṣaṇāya
• ṁkṣepeṇa anubhāṣate । ātmaiva tu ityādinā pūrvapakṣī svamataṁ
• rdhaślokoktaṁ saṁkṣipya darśayati । tuśabdaḥ svapakṣasya viśeṣaṁ
• otayann upapannatāṁ dhvanayan siddhāntimatasya dūṣyamāṇatvaṁ sūcayati
• siddhāntī khalu anupalabdher asiddhatāṁ brūyād ity āśaṅkya yam
• dhaślokaṁ brūte, tasya arthaṁ saṁkṣepeṇa āha ahaṁpratyayenāpi ityādinā
• ādiśabdena indriyaprāṇajñānādisaṁtānasya saṁgrahaḥ । ity āha iti
• advastu ślokadvayena āhety arthaḥ । katham । ākṣipan ākṣepeṇa lakṣitā
• canakriyā iyam iti yāvat । anena nanuśabdasya ākṣepadyotakatā
• ākhyātā । ākṣepeṇa ca pūrvapakṣī yuktividagdhaṁmanyatākrāntahr̥dayo
• ra vipratipanno yatnena svābhiniveśāt
• ujanyāṅgīkr̥taparopakāraprāvaṇyena siddhāntinā nivartyate iti sūcayann
• ñasasaṁśayau daṇḍāpūpikayaiva iha vyutpādyete iti darśayati

• See ĪPV I 54: nanu iti ākṣepe ।

• See ĪPV I 56-57: tan na, yato dvayam api etad avikalpetararūpaṁ na
• yasya kasyacit etadatiriktasya draṣṭuḥ anubhavituḥ saṁbandhi ।

• See ĪPK1.2.4cd: smr̥tiḥ kenātha yatraivānubhavas tatpadaiva sā ।।

• See ĪPVV I 126: ṭīkākāraḥ atha yatraiva ityādeḥ yady evam ityantasya
• trasya tātparyaṁ pūrvārtha ityādinā viṣayavattābhiṣṭau ityantena
• hyāya ko ’rthaḥ ityāder āha ātmopagamo vyarthaḥ itiśabdena
• targaḍuśabdasya vyarthaḥ ityanena ko ’rthaḥ ity asya ।
• thāvabhāsakr̥tā vāsanā saṁskārarūpā yasya ātmano
• tarmukhabodharūpasya, sa yadā tādr̥śadarśanakr̥tavāsanāprabodhadvāreṇa
• abodhito bhavati ।

• See ĪPVV I 130-31: tasmāt saṁskārasya āśraya ekaḥ, ekatvādeva ca
• hiro yaḥ; sa eva ātmeti pūrvapakṣavādino matam āśaṅkya kārikāṁ
• ṁkṣepeṇa vyācaṣṭe pūrvakārikārtham eva upajīvan tad evam iti । yato
• tya ātmā ato yathā asāv anuditasaṁskāro ’pi na smr̥tau vyāpariṣṭa;
• thā uditasaṁskāro ’pi na vyāpriyeta tatsvarūpasya aṁśenāpi
• ailakṣaṇyāt । vailakṣaṇyaṁ hi saṁskāra eva, tatkr̥te vā
• atirekarāhitye tasya pūrvarūpāpāyādanityatvam । vyatirikte tu tasya na
• t kiṁcit syāt । tataḥ saṁskārasya kim āśrayeṇa smr̥tau janyāyām
• upayukteneti mātrapadam । ubhayam apīha kalpanārūpaṁ kevalaṁ
• rvasiddhatvād ekaṁ sūtre upamānatvena uktam ity āśayena āha draṣṭāyaṁ
• artā ca iti ।

• The full text of this footnote is from the Nr̥pativārtikaṭῑkā. See ŚD
• , fn. 3: avigalitasvarūpasatattvasyaiva bhāvasya
• armakalparūpāntaracchāyādhāraṇaṁ ghaṭasyevodakāharaṇaṁ caitrasyeva
• manaṁ vr̥ttir ucyate । tathā tadvr̥ttibhedān na vr̥ttibhedo bhavati
• naiva rūpeṇābādhitapratyabhijñāviṣayatvāt ।

• See ĪPVV I 133: tatra prathamam ajaḍarūpatve jñānaṁ siddhāntino na
• apadyate iti yat sūtreṇa ucyate, tat saṁkṣepeṇa avatārayati ātmanaḥ
• i । sūtre anityam iti prādhānyād upāttaṁ dharmāntarāṇy api
• ilakṣaṇyakārīṇi upalakṣayatīty āśayena dvitvavikalpeneti sāmānyena āha
• ātmāpi citsvabhāvo jñānam api, tato dvitvena anyatvena
• tyatvānityatvalakṣaṇena dharmadharmibhāvena ca yā kalpanā kr̥tā, sā
• upapannā, pramāṇamūlatvābhāvāt na vastusādhanītyetadvastu āha

• See ĪPVV I 145: asya arthaṁ saṁkṣepeṇa ṭīkākāro vyācaṣṭe sāṁkhyo ’yam
• i iti । samyak khyātiḥ prakr̥tipuruṣayorvivekena, saṁkhyānaṁ ca
• rigaṇanaṁ tattvabhedānāṁ saṁkhyā; tad adhikr̥tya kr̥to granthaḥ sāṁkhyaḥ
• tatra buddhitattvasya vr̥ttir jñānam uktam । vartanaṁ vr̥ttiḥ
• riṇāmaviśeṣaḥ । pūrvarūpaṁ hi tirodadhat kaścit pariṇāmaḥ
• ṣṭhabhasmavat, sa kāryapariṇāma ucyate; yas tu atirodadhat, sa
• armapariṇāmo yaḥ siddhākāratayā bhāti suvarṇasyeva kuṇḍalatā; yas tu
• irodadhat sādhyākāratvena gacchati budhyate iti yathā, sa
• ̥ttipariṇāmaḥ । tathā hi vartanaṁ tasyeva tatheti vr̥ttir ucyate ।
• rvavad eva iti cidbhāgadvāreṇa nityatādidūṣaṇam, jaḍabhāgadiśā
• ṣayavyavasthānāyogaḥ iti ।

• See ŚD 21, fn. 3: avigalitasvarūpasatattvasyaiva bhāvasya
• armakalparūpāntaracchāyādhāraṇaṁ ghaṭasyevodakāharaṇaṁ caitrasyeva
• manaṁ vr̥ttir ucyate । tathā tadvr̥ttibhedānna vr̥ttibhedo bhavati
• naiva rūpeṇābādhitapratyabhijñāviṣayatvāt ।

• See ĪPVr̥ 1.3.5: adhyavasāya eva bhrāntyā viṣayavyavasthāpako na tu
• asaṁvit, sa ca jaḍaḥ katham arthavyavasthāyā hetuḥ । cidrūpo ’py
• ītārthamātram ābhāsayed abāhyasvātmollekhamātraprakāśo vā na taddhetuḥ
• 5।।

• See ĪPV I 102, fn. 21: nanu kenaivam uktaṁ - jaḍo ’dhyavasāyaḥ
• ṁvitsvabhāvo hy asau jñānāvyatirekāt ity āha tata ityādi । nijaṁ ca
• lekhaś ca dvandvaḥ । niṣṭhād iti lyablope pañcamī । tataḥ
• r̥tyadhyavasāyata iti ।

• See ĪPVV I 253-54: tathā vr̥ttiḥ svātmamātra iti । atra hetur
• antaropapādito nyāyaḥ । tena hi nyāyena kiṁ kr̥tam iti । āha
• arūpamātra iti । iyatā prathamaṁ kārikārdhaṁ vyākhyātam, dvitīyaṁ
• ācaṣṭe tataś ca iti । tataḥ parajñānaviṣayasvīkārābhāvāc ca arthinām
• thakriyālābhaḥ pravr̥ttipūrvako na syād arthitāyā eva anudayāt । sā hi
• avr̥ttiviṣayasya prārthanīyasya arthaviśeṣasya niścaye sati bhavati ।
• ārthanīyaś ca ittham artho bhavati yadi sa pūrvaṁ sukhasādhanatvena
• ̥ṣṭa iti niścayaḥ । evaṁ ca viṣayasaṁmelanātmā niścayaḥ
• ārthanākāraṇaṁ, tat nāstīti kāraṇānupalabdhyā prārthanāyā abhāve
• yaiva uttarottarakāryāṇām abhāvaḥ iti
• ārthanādhyavasāyapravr̥ttiprāptihānādānasaṁvyavahārādir lokayātrā
• sīdet । kramopajātasya saṁvitprabandhasya vicitraṁ kr̥tvā
• ṁyojanaviyojanādinā bahuprakāreṇa vaicitryeṇa yat kasmiṁścit viṣaye
• lanaṁ – yas tvayā adya viṣayo dr̥śyate, sa pūrvam api mayā ittham
• alokitaḥ ityevaṁrūpaṁ; tena kila tatsamarthācaraṇaṁ pravr̥ttiviṣayasya
• thaviśeṣasya niścaye kriyeta । tad eva tu na ghaṭate । anena
• usaṁdhānajanmā iti vyākhyātam ।