q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.trika-vimarsa-nature-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:trika-vimarsa-nature",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/trika-vimarsa-nature-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "trika-vimarsa-nature",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "Abhinavagupta distinguishes his view from the Buddhist svasaṃvitti doctrine: self-awareness is the very nature (svabhāva) of consciousness, not a result (phala) produced by cognition.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-svasamvedana-nature",
   "quoted_anchor": "svasaṁvedyaṁ svaprakāśam na tu svasaṁvedanānyapramāṇaprameyam",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_svasamvedana_nature,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "self-awareness is the nature of consciou",
    "hetu": "consciousness is self-luminous and not dependent on any external means of knowledge",
    "sadhya": "self-awareness is the nature of consciousness, not a result",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness is self-luminous and its own object, then self-awareness is its"
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the Buddhist phala model of self-awareness is compatible with consciousness being self-luminous — i.e., that the result-of-cognition account does not undermine intrinsic self-awareness."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-svasamvedana-nature:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.75,
   "relation_rationale": "Direct textual evidence that svasaṃvedana is svabhāva, not phala."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-svasamvedana-nature:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.55,
   "relation_rationale": "If self-awareness is nature not result, the Buddhist phala model is challenged."
  }
 ],
 "bridge_probe_logic": {},
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "current_best_answer": "Abhinavagupta distinguishes his view from the Buddhist svasaṃvitti doctrine: self-awareness is the very nature (svabhāva) of consciousness, not a result (phala) produced by cognition.",
  "next_tests": []
 }
}