q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.nanavira-groundless-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:nanavira-groundless",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/nanavira-groundless-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "nanavira-groundless",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "Ñāṇavīra rejects both Dignāga's 'structure is self-grounding' and Abhinavagupta's 'awareness grounds the structure.' He offers a third position: the search for a ground IS the conceit 'I am' (asmimāna). Reflexivity is groundless — consciousness is anidassana (non-indicative), pointing to no ground.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "source_span_id": "span:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "quoted_anchor": "Ñāṇavīra's position on the self-grounding question: neither ",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(nanavira_groundless_reflexivity,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "nanavira_phenomenology",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "the self-grounding question is misposed ",
    "hetu": "viññāṇa is negative as regards essence; the search for a ground is asmimāna",
    "sadhya": "the self-grounding question is misposed — reflexivity is groundless",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness has no essence and points to no ground, then the question 'what"
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:nanavira-structural-reflexivity",
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that Ñāṇavīra's anidassana viññāṇa still presupposes a ground (e.g., the structure itself or the mere fact of presence), making his position a variant of Dignāga's self-grounding rather than a distinct third way."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity:support:cand-nanavira-structural-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "target_node_id": "cand:nanavira-structural-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.8,
   "relation_rationale": "Groundless reflexivity is Ñāṇavīra's distinct position on the self-grounding question."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity:attack:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.55,
   "relation_rationale": "If the search for a ground is asmimāna, Abhinavagupta's vimarśa-as-foundation is reframed as a subtle expression of the conceit 'I am.'"
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.4,
   "relation_rationale": "Dignāga's self-grounding structure is also a form of foundationalism that Ñāṇavīra's groundless reflexivity rejects."
  }
 ],
 "bridge_probe_logic": {},
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "current_best_answer": "Ñāṇavīra rejects both Dignāga's 'structure is self-grounding' and Abhinavagupta's 'awareness grounds the structure.' He offers a third position: the search for a ground IS the conceit 'I am' (asmimāna). Reflexivity is groundless — consciousness is anidassana (non-indicative), pointing to no ground.",
  "next_tests": []
 }
}