q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.abh-svasamvedana-nature-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:abh-svasamvedana-nature",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/abh-svasamvedana-nature-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "abh-svasamvedana-nature",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "Self-awareness is the nature (svabhāva) of consciousness, not a result (phala) of cognition. The Buddhist svasaṃvitti doctrine treats self-awareness as the result of cognition; Abhinavagupta argues this makes it derivative rather than intrinsic.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala",
   "quoted_anchor": "svasaṁvedyaṁ svaprakāśam na tu svasaṁvedanānyapramāṇaprameyam",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_svasamvedana_nature_not_phala,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "self-awareness is the nature of consciou",
    "hetu": "consciousness is self-luminous and its own object, not dependent on external means of knowledge",
    "sadhya": "self-awareness is the nature of consciousness, not a produced result",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness is self-luminous and self-aware by nature, then self-awareness "
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the Buddhist phala-model of svasaṃvitti is compatible with svaprakāśa — that a result-of-cognition can also be the nature of consciousness without contradiction."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.75,
   "relation_rationale": "Direct textual evidence distinguishing svabhāva from phala models."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-svasamvedana-nature-not-phala",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.55,
   "relation_rationale": "The Buddhist phala-model makes self-awareness derivative."
  }
 ],
 "bridge_probe_logic": {},
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "current_best_answer": "Self-awareness is the nature (svabhāva) of consciousness, not a result (phala) of cognition. The Buddhist svasaṃvitti doctrine treats self-awareness as the result of cognition; Abhinavagupta argues this makes it derivative rather than intrinsic.",
  "next_tests": []
 }
}