स्वातन्त्र्यfreedom · trika library
State-of-play

q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.abh-self-grounding-map

vendored research asset · q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.abh-self-grounding-map.json
{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:abh-self-grounding",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/abh-self-grounding-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "abh-self-grounding",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "Abhinavagupta argues the two-aspect structure is self-grounding (TĀ 4/9, TĀ 4/185cd-186ab). The Heart/vimarśa is the foundation of consciousness itself — not a separate prior substrate. Both Dignāga and Abhinavagupta agree the structure is self-grounding; they disagree on what does the grounding.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding",
   "quoted_anchor": "TĀ 4/9: consciousness is by its very nature full (nirbharā),",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_ta4_9_self_grounding,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "the two-aspect structure is self-groundi",
    "hetu": "consciousness is svātmasaṃvitti, full in itself, depending on nothing",
    "sadhya": "the two-aspect structure is self-grounding through vimarśa, not through a separate prior consciousness",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness needs nothing outside itself and its foundation is the Heart, t"
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that Abhinavagupta posits Anuttara as a genuinely separate ontological ground beyond the two-aspect structure, not as the same reality under a different aspect."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.8,
   "relation_rationale": "Abhinavagupta's position is self-grounding, not dependent on an external substrate."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-ta4-9-self-grounding",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.45,
   "relation_rationale": "Both traditions say the structure is self-grounding; the difference is where they locate the self-grounding principle."
  }
 ],
 "bridge_probe_logic": {},
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "current_best_answer": "Abhinavagupta argues the two-aspect structure is self-grounding (TĀ 4/9, TĀ 4/185cd-186ab). The Heart/vimarśa is the foundation of consciousness itself — not a separate prior substrate. Both Dignāga and Abhinavagupta agree the structure is self-grounding; they disagree on what does the grounding.",
  "next_tests": []
 }
}
Sources & corrections: edit source →. source lives here.
{varjs}