q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.abh-original-svasamvedana-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:abh-original-svasamvedana",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/abh-original-svasamvedana-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "abh-original-svasamvedana",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "Abhinavagupta makes original philosophical arguments (yukti) for svasaṃvedana as the nature of consciousness in TĀ 3, TĀ 4.8-9, and TĀ 4.181cd-182ab. These are not scripture quotations but rational arguments that self-awareness is intrinsic to consciousness, without which it would be insentient.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument",
   "quoted_anchor": "In TĀ 4.8-9, Abhinavagupta presents an original pūrvapakṣa-s",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_ta4_8_9_original_argument,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "svasaṃvedana is the intrinsic nature of ",
    "hetu": "the objection that self-awareness would objectify consciousness fails because self-awareness is not objectification",
    "sadhya": "svasaṃvedana is the intrinsic nature of consciousness, not a second-order reflection",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness is by nature self-aware, then self-awareness is not a problem b"
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that Abhinavagupta's argument in TĀ 4.8-9 depends on scriptural authority rather than reason, or that the objection he refutes is a straw man not held by any actual Buddhist opponent."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-ta4-181-original-heart-argument",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-ta4-181-original-heart-argument",
   "quoted_anchor": "In TĀ 4.181cd-182ab, Abhinavagupta argues in his own voice t",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_ta4_181_original_heart_argument,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "self-awareness is not static but dynamic",
    "hetu": "consciousness is self-aware by nature, and this self-awareness is spontaneously creative",
    "sadhya": "self-awareness is not static but dynamic — it is the creative Heart of reality",
    "vyapti": "If self-awareness is the nature of consciousness and is spontaneously creative, "
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the mahā hṛdaya argument depends on a specific scriptural tradition that Abhinavagupta is merely transmitting, not extending."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.8,
   "relation_rationale": "Original rational argument for svasaṃvedana as svabhāva, not transmitted scripture."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-ta4-8-9-original-argument",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.55,
   "relation_rationale": "If svasaṃvedana is argued by reason not authority, the Buddhist objection that it's mere scripture fails."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-ta4-181-original-heart-argument:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_nod