q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.abh-crystal-refutes-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:abh-crystal-refutes",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/abh-crystal-refutes-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "source_role": "abh-crystal-refutes",
 "candidate_under_test": "all",
 "central_reading": "The crystal argument (without vimarśa, consciousness is insentient like a crystal) applies to any account that treats self-awareness as derivative — including the Buddhist svasaṃvitti phala-model. If self-awareness is a result of cognition, it can be absent when cognition is absent; but consciousness cannot be absent from itself.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model",
   "source_span_id": "span:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model",
   "quoted_anchor": "Without vimarśa, consciousness would be insentient, like a crystal",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_crystal_applies_to_phala_model,target)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "the crystal argument refutes any derivat",
    "hetu": "if self-awareness is produced by cognition, then before cognition there is no self-awareness",
    "sadhya": "the crystal argument refutes any derivative account of self-awareness, including svasaṃvitti phala-model",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness cannot be insentient at any moment, self-awareness must be intr"
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
    "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
    "crux:constructed-reflexivity-presupposes-manifestness"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the Buddhist phala-model does not imply periods without self-awareness — i.e., that cognition is continuous and self-awareness is co-extensive with it, making the result-as-nature distinction merely verbal."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model:support:cand-abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model",
   "target_node_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
   "edge_type": "support",
   "strength": 0.72,
   "relation_rationale": "Extends crystal argument to explicitly cover the Buddhist phala-model."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model:attack:cand-dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model",
   "target_node_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.58,
   "relation_rationale": "If crystal argument refutes the phala-model, the Buddhist response needs a different account of self-awareness."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model:attack:crux-constructed-reflexivity-presupposes-manifestness",
   "source_node_id": "cl:abh-crystal-applies-to-phala-model",
   "target_node_id": "crux:constructed-reflexivity-presupposes-manifestness",
   "edge_type": "attack",
   "strength": 0.5,
   "relation_rationale": "Narrows the crux: the question becomes whether any derivative account of self-awareness is coherent."
  }
 ],
 "bridge_probe_logic": {},
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "current_best_answer": "The crystal argument (without vimarśa, consciousness is insentient like a crystal) applies to any account that treats self-awareness as derivative — including the Buddhist svasaṃvitti phala-model. If self-awareness is a result of cognition, it can be absent when cognition is absent; but consciousness cannot be absent from itself.",
  "next_tests": []
 }
}