q-universalization-pratyabhijna-vs-nyaya.nyaya-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:utpaladeva-universalization-validity",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:nyaya-atmatattvaviveka-subject",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/nyaya-atmatattvaviveka-subject-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "manual_codex_review_from_truthanother",
 "source_role": "countermodel",
 "candidate_under_test": "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
 "central_reading": "Nyāya plural selves provide the strongest live countermodel to Pratyabhijñā's universal subject. Udayana's Ātmatattvaviveka defends enduring individual selves against Buddhist momentariness and demonstrates that memory, recognition, and cognition can be explained without universal consciousness.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nyaya-plural-selves-explain-without-universal",
   "source_span_id": "span:nyaya-plural-selves",
   "quoted_anchor": "Memory, recognition, desire, effort and cognition belong to enduring individual selves",
   "nn_expr": "vyapti(atman_bahutva,sarvartha_samvit_eka_pramatr)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "nyaya",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "ātman",
    "hetu": "plural selves explain the same phenomena without requiring universality",
    "sadhya": "universal consciousness is not uniquely required",
    "vyapti": "Where a cheaper explanation covers the same data, the more expensive explanation is not proven."
   },
   "argument_role": "countermodel",
   "targets": [
    "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
    "crux:numerical-identity-of-finite-and-unlimited-self",
    "bridge:utpaladeva-subject-nyaya-plural-self"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that a specifically universal subject is required to explain some cognitive phenomenon that plural selves cannot."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nyaya-momentariness-destabilizes-identity",
   "source_span_id": "span:nyaya-momentariness",
   "quoted_anchor": "momentariness destabilizes causality, universals, identification, memory",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(ksanikatva,atma_sthiratva)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "nyaya",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "ātmā",
    "hetu": "momentariness undermines the conditions for cognition",
    "sadhya": "cognition requires an enduring substrate",
    "vyapti": "Where cognition requires persistence, an enduring substrate is required."
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
    "crux:transpersonal-synthesis-unobserved"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the endurance required for cognition is specifically universal rather than individual."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nyaya-map-plural-selves-support",
   "source": "cl:nyaya-plural-selves-explain-without-universal",
   "target": "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
   "edge_type": "supports",
   "strength": 0.6,
   "rationale": "Nyaya offers a complete alternative explanation without universal consciousness."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nyaya-map-plural-attacks-universal",
   "source": "cl:nyaya-plural-selves-explain-without-universal",
   "target": "cand:utpaladeva-universal-subject",
   "edge_type": "attacks",
   "strength": 0.55,
   "rationale": "If plural selves explain the same data, universal subject is not uniquely required."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nyaya-map-momentariness-supports-endurance",
   "source": "cl:nyaya-momentariness-destabilizes-identity",
   "target": "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
   "edge_type": "supports",
   "strength": 0.5,
   "rationale": "Udayana's anti-momentariness argument supports the need for endurance."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:nyaya-map-bridge-overlaps",
   "source": "cand:nyaya-plural-selves",
   "target": "bridge:utpaladeva-subject-nyaya-plural-self",
   "edg