State-of-play
q-perspectival-partition.sheaf-map
vendored research asset · q-perspectival-partition.sheaf-map.json
{
"schema_version": 1,
"artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
"question_id": "q:perspectival-partition",
"source_packet_id": "ip:perspectival-partition-sheaf-gluing",
"claim_packet": "content/information-packets/perspectival-partition-sheaf-gluing-claims.json",
"generated_by": "codex",
"source_role": "formal_constraint",
"central_reading": "All theories of consciousness face the same gate: they need a law Λ that maps manifestation or organization into exclusive phenomenal domains. The universalization debate was a special case of this deeper problem. The sheaf-theoretic gluing theorem provides an exact formal warning: local coherence does not entail global unifiability.",
"nnexpr_mappings": [
{
"claim_id": "cl:sheaf-local-coherence-not-global",
"source_span_id": "span:checkpoint-9-globj",
"quoted_anchor": "local coherence does not entail global unifiability",
"nn_expr": "virodha(local_agreement,global_section)",
"parse_status": "invalid",
"tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
"evidence_dimension": "formal",
"pramana": "anumana",
"nyaya_reading": {
"paksa": "phenomenal field",
"hetu": "local fields lack phenomenal overlap",
"sadhya": "shared character does not entail one global field",
"vyapti": "Where local data agrees on empty overlaps, no global section follows."
},
"argument_role": "universal_constraint",
"targets": [
"cand:siva-decombination",
"cand:naturalist-emergent",
"crux:local-to-global-gluing"
],
"gate_outcome": "needs_review",
"fallacies_flagged": [
{
"type": "savyabhicara",
"severity": "weak",
"reason": "NNExpr virodha operator not in grammar; parsed as claim without formal/bridge status"
}
],
"falsifier": "Show that phenomenal fields do overlap in a non-empty self-presence that constitutes a genuine global section."
},
{
"claim_id": "cl:privacy-not-a-positive-boundary",
"source_span_id": "span:checkpoint-11-privacy",
"quoted_anchor": "phenomenal separation need not appear as a positive boundary",
"nn_expr": "sambandha(exclusion,absence_of_co-presence)",
"parse_status": "invalid",
"tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
"evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
"pramana": "pratyaksa",
"nyaya_reading": {
"paksa": "phenomenal exclusion",
"hetu": "other experiences are not presented as bounded objects",
"sadhya": "exclusion can be privative",
"vyapti": "Where no boundary appears, separation may still obtain as absence of co-presence."
},
"argument_role": "attack_on_absorpt_boundary_argument",
"targets": [
"cand:siva-decombination",
"crux:boundary-introspection-invalid"
],
"gate_outcome": "accepted",
"fallacies_flagged": [],
"candidate_under_test": "cand:siva-decombination"
},
{
"claim_id": "cl:all-theories-same-gate",
"source_span_id": "span:checkpoint-28-bind",
"quoted_anchor": "Every theory reaches the same gate",
"nn_expr": "vyapti(every_theory,lambda_missing)",
"parse_status": "invalid",
"tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
"evidence_dimension": "formal",
"pramana": "anumana",
"nyaya_reading": {
"paksa": "theories of consciousness",
"hetu": "all can be expressed as {X → Λ → Dᵢ}",
"sadhya": "Λ is the common missing object",
"vyapti": "Where every theory requires an unexplained function, that function is the shared gap."
},
"argument_role": "metaclaim",
"targets": [
"cand:naturalist-emergent",
"cand:siva-decombination",
"cand:buddhist-stream",
"cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
"cand:neutral-monist",
"crux:the-law-lambda"
],
"gate_outcome": "accepted",
"fallacies_flagged": [],
"candidate_under_test": "crux:the-law-lambda"
}
],
"argument_edges": [
{
"edge_id": "edge:sheaf-gluing-pressures-pratyabhijna",
"source": "cl:sheaf-local-coherence-not-global",
"target": "cand:siva-decombination",
"edge_type": "attacks",
"strSources & corrections: edit source →. source lives here.