q-perspectival-partition.scientific-exclusion-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:perspectival-partition",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:scientific-exclusion-principles",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/scientific-exclusion-principles-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex",
 "source_role": "empirical_constraint",
 "central_reading": "Scientific evidence constrains Λ — the law of perspectival partition — without yet specifying it. IIT's exclusion axiom is the closest approximation. Lesion dissociations constrain the dimensional structure. Non-transitive unity constrains the formal structure.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:iit-exclusion-closest-approximation",
   "source_span_id": "span:iit-exclusion",
   "quoted_anchor": "IIT is the closest scientific theory",
   "nn_expr": "vyapti(max_phi,exclusion_principle)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "western_phi_neuroscience",
   "evidence_dimension": "empirical",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:naturalist-emergent",
    "crux:iit-exclusion-not-derived"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Derive manifestness from causal irreducibility without appealing to axioms that already assume the target."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:lesion-exclusion-reveals-partition",
   "source_span_id": "span:lesion-dissociations",
   "quoted_anchor": "content, access, and arousal dissociations in brain damage",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(phenomenal_dimensions,indivisibility)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "clinical_neuroscience",
   "evidence_dimension": "empirical",
   "pramana": "pratyaksa",
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:naturalist-emergent",
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "crux:dissociation-constrains-lambda"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show lesion evidence affecting all phenomenal dimensions equally."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:non-transitive-unity-constrains-lambda",
   "source_span_id": "span:non-transitive-unity",
   "quoted_anchor": "phenomenal unity may be non-transitive",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(co_consciousness,transitivity)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "evidence_dimension": "empirical",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:naturalist-emergent",
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
    "crux:transitivity-of-unity-unsettled"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show decisive evidence that phenomenal unity IS transitive."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:iit-closest-but-gap",
   "source": "cl:iit-exclusion-closest-approximation",
   "target": "cand:naturalist-emergent",
   "edge_type": "supports",
   "strength": 0.4,
   "rationale": "IIT is the strongest naturalist candidate for Λ, but hasn't closed the manifestness gap."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:iit-gap-pressures-naturalist",
   "source": "cl:iit-exclusion-closest-approximation",
   "target": "cand:naturalist-emergent",
   "edge_type": "attacks",
   "strength": 0.35,
   "rationale": "The axiom-postulate gap means IIT has not solved the partition problem."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:lesion-constrains-siva-partition",
   "source": "cl:lesion-exclusion-reveals-partition",
   "target": "cand:siva-decombination",
   "edge_type": "supports",
   "strength": 0.25,
   "rationale": "Kañcuka-dimensional mapping onto clinical dissociations is suggestive."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:non-transitive-pressures-nyaya",
   "source": "cl:non-transitive-unity-constrains-lambda",
   "target": "cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
   "edge_type": "attacks",
   "strength": 0.3,
   "rationale": "Clean partition by substance is challenged by overlapping/non-transitive unity."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:non-transitive-pressures