q-perspectival-partition.saiva-decombination-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:perspectival-partition",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:saiva-decombination-bind",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/saiva-decombination-bind-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex_from_translated_siddhis",
 "source_role": "candidate_constraint",
 "candidate_under_test": "cand:siva-decombination",
 "central_reading": "The three Siddhitrayī texts (APS, Sambandhasiddhi, Īśvarasiddhi) have now all been translated. None supplies the missing nondual universalization proof. APS asserts but does not prove it. Sambandhasiddhi assumes the framework. Īśvarasiddhi is intentionally dualistic. The decombination bind remains: Pratyabhijñā has not specified how unrestricted manifestation produces private exclusion profiles.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:aps-universalization-asserts-not-proves",
   "source_span_id": "span:aps-16-17-25",
   "quoted_anchor": "eka evānusandhānād ato 'nyo nopapadyate",
   "nn_expr": "vyapti(anusandhana_loka,eka_pramatr)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "pramāt",
    "hetu": "anusandhāna observed within one body",
    "sadhya": "one knower",
    "vyapti": "Where anusandhāna operates, a unified knower is required."
   },
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "crux:local-to-global-gluing"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show anusandhāna operating across cognitive streams in a way not reducible to inference."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:sambandhasiddhi-aikatyma-assumes-framework",
   "source_span_id": "span:ss-8",
   "quoted_anchor": "cinmātravapuṣāṃ satām",
   "nn_expr": "abheda(vastu,cinmatra)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "vastu",
    "hetu": "entities are cinmātravapus",
    "sadhya": "their unity is easy",
    "vyapti": "If entities have consciousness as their essence, unity follows."
   },
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "crux:cinmatravapus-circularity"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [
    {
     "type": "asiddha",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "reason": "The premise 'entities are consciousness-essenced' is assumed from ĪPK, not argued here."
    }
   ],
   "falsifier": "Show an independent argument for cinmātravapus within Sambandhasiddhi."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:isvarasiddhi-dualistic-design-not-nondual",
   "source_span_id": "span:is-56",
   "quoted_anchor": "if that highest recognition must be established, its structure has been set out by us elsewhere",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(isvara_siddhi,nondual_prameya)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "Īśvarasiddhi",
    "hetu": "its argument is designed for a dualistic framework",
    "sadhya": "it does not contain the nondual proof",
    "vyapti": "A text designed for dualists does not supply nondual conclusions."
   },
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "crux:isvarasiddhi-scope-limitation"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Reconstruct a nondual argument from Īśvarasiddhi alone, without appeal to ĪPK."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:decombination-bind-maya-not-explained",
   "source_span_id": "span:cp8-decombination",
   "quoted_anchor": "Pratyabhijñā solves the emergence of manifestation only by inheriting decombination",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(siva,maya_privacy)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "forma