q-perspectival-partition.constructed-ownership-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:perspectival-partition",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:constructed-ownership",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/constructed-ownership-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "codex",
 "central_reading": "Ownership may be constructed within manifestation rather than given with it. The decomposition of first-personality into five separable senses and the valuation-appropriation loop both suggest that 'mine-ness' is built from more basic elements. But manifestness itself remains unexplained by construction models.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:first-personality-decomposed-five-senses",
   "source_span_id": "span:cp4-decomposition",
   "quoted_anchor": "P_S ≠ P_G ≠ P_A ≠ P_O ≠ P_I",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(first_personality,simplicity)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "pratyaksa",
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
    "cand:siva-decombination",
    "cand:buddhist-stream",
    "crux:first-personality-decomposed"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show a state that inseparably possesses all five aspects."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nimana-vedana-constructs-ownership",
   "source_span_id": "span:cp4-construction",
   "quoted_anchor": "valuation and appropriation construct ownership",
   "nn_expr": "vyapti(valuation_loop,ownership)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "argument_role": "constraint",
   "targets": [
    "cand:buddhist-stream",
    "cand:naturalist-emergent",
    "crux:ownership-constructed-but-manifestness-unexplained"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Derive manifestness from valuation alone."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:mattering-grounds-locality",
   "source_span_id": "span:contention-8",
   "quoted_anchor": "recurrent mattering stabilizes the local subject",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(mattering,partition)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "argument_role": "hypothesis",
   "targets": [
    "cand:buddhist-stream",
    "cand:naturalist-emergent",
    "cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
    "crux:mattering-grounds-partition"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show identical concern patterns with exclusive domains."
  }
 ],
 "argument_edges": [
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:decomposition-pressures-nyaya-substance",
   "source": "cl:first-personality-decomposed-five-senses",
   "target": "cand:nyaya-plural-substances",
   "edge_type": "attacks",
   "strength": 0.35,
   "rationale": "If first-personality decomposes, the simple substance-owner is challenged."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:construction-loops-pressures-pratyabhijna",
   "source": "cl:nimana-vedana-constructs-ownership",
   "target": "cand:siva-decombination",
   "edge_type": "attacks",
   "strength": 0.25,
   "rationale": "If ownership is constructed, the Śaiva claim that the owner (Śiva) is intrinsic to manifestation is weakened."
  },
  {
   "edge_id": "edge:mattering-partition-supports-buddhist",
   "source": "cl:mattering-grounds-locality",
   "target": "cand:buddhist-stream",
   "edge_type": "supports",
   "strength": 0.3,
   "rationale": "Divergent concern patterns support conventional stream individuation."
  }
 ],
 "structural_correspondences": [],
 "directional_critique_pairs": [],
 "state_of_play_delta": {
  "constructed_ownership": "The decomposition of first-personality and the valuation-appropriation loop both suggest ownership is constructed. But manifestness remains unexplained by construction models.",
  "current_best_answer": "Ownership may be co