q-brain-if-consciousness-fundamental.dataset-feasibility-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:brain-if-consciousness-fundamental",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:q17-dataset-feasibility-finding",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/q17-dataset-feasibility-finding.json",
 "generated_by": "hermes_loop_009",
 "source_role": "recovery_wager_dataset_feasibility",
 "candidate_under_test": "cand:brain-as-appearance-only",
 "central_reading": "This layer evaluates the feasibility of the recovery trajectory hierarchy wager protocol (Loop 008) against existing DOC recovery datasets through a systematic literature survey. Four claims document: (1) that no single existing dataset meets the protocol's minimum requirements; (2) that TRACK-TBI offers a feasible coarse-grained path via GOSE-to-hierarchy mapping; (3) that IPD meta-analysis of smaller CRS-R studies offers a complementary path with subscale granularity; (4) that Porta et al.'s N=216 diagnostic-transition cohort provides a supplementary path at the diagnostic-category level. The layer does not defeat the wager — it refines it, showing the protocol must adapt to available data. The wager shifts from 'can we test this now on one ideal dataset' to 'what can we learn from multiple imperfect datasets'. This is a productive constraint: it forces each consciousness-first account to state whether its recovery prediction is robust enough to survive coarse-grained testing (TRACK-TBI GOSE, Porta diagnostic transitions) or requires the ideal CRS-R protocol.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:recovery-wager-no-single-dataset-meets-protocol",
   "source_span_id": "synthetic:q17-dataset-feasibility-finding",
   "quoted_anchor": "No existing single DOC recovery dataset simultaneously satisfies the wager protocol's minimum requirements: N ≥ 50 patients with ≥ 4 CRS-R assessments over ≥ 6 months with subscale data.",
   "nn_expr": "abhava(existing_dataset_meets_protocol_requirements)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "parse_note": "abhava operator not in current NNExpr grammar; expression conveys absence of any dataset meeting protocol requirements",
   "tradition_scope": "empirical_feasibility",
   "evidence_dimension": "empirical",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "actionability of recovery trajectory hierarchy wager",
    "hetu": "Systematic PubMed search (2018–2026) found no DOC recovery dataset with N ≥ 50, ≥ 4 CRS-R assessments, ≥ 6 months, subscale data",
    "sadhya": "The wager protocol is not immediately actionable on any single existing dataset as specified",
    "vyapti": "If a systematic literature search returns no dataset meeting specified requirements, those requirements are not met by any publicly documented dataset"
   },
   "argument_role": "pressure",
   "targets": [
    "cand:brain-as-appearance-only",
    "cand:brain-as-filter",
    "cand:brain-as-interface-generative-model",
    "crux:brain-damage-transformation"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Identify a single publicly documented DOC recovery dataset satisfying N ≥ 50, ≥ 4 CRS-R assessments, ≥ 6 months, with subscale-level data."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:recovery-wager-track-tbi-coarse-path",
   "source_span_id": "synthetic:q17-dataset-feasibility-finding",
   "quoted_anchor": "Among participants in a vegetative state at 2 weeks, 62 of 79 (78%) regained consciousness and 14 of 56 with available data (25%) regained orientation by 12 months.",
   "nn_expr": "upaya(track_tbi_cohort,coarse_recovery_hierarchy_test)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "parse_note": "upaya operator not in current NNExpr grammar; expression conveys methodological-path relationship",
   "tradition_scope": "empirical_feasibility",
   "evidence_dimension": "empirical",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "actionability of recovery wager via TRACK-TBI",
    "hetu": "TRACK-TBI msTBI cohort has N=484, 4 timepoints over 12 months, ~79 init