q-brain-if-consciousness-fundamental.appearance-map

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_source_map",
 "question_id": "q:brain-if-consciousness-fundamental",
 "source_packet_id": "ip:q17-appearance-sources-claims",
 "claim_packet": "content/information-packets/q17-appearance-sources-claims.json",
 "generated_by": "hermes",
 "source_role": "appearance_sources_layer",
 "candidate_under_test": "cand:brain-as-appearance-only",
 "central_reading": "The appearance-within-consciousness candidate now has real peer-reviewed source material — Bernardo Kastrup's analytic idealism in Disputatio (2017), Philosophies (2017), Journal of Consciousness Studies (2018), and METOD (2020). These papers provide: (1) a direct argument that brain-dependence does not refute idealism, (2) a dissociation model explaining how NCCs can be extrinsic appearances of dissociative processes within universal consciousness, (3) an epistemic argument for the primacy of mind over matter, and (4) a reduction thesis that all physical structure is configuration of consciousness. Miri Albahari's perennial idealism (2019 preprint) provides a complementary cross-tradition framework. This layer fills the gap identified in the original state-of-play: the appearance candidate now has positive doctrinal content from contemporary peer-reviewed philosophy, not merely a transcendental placeholder.",
 "nnexpr_mappings": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:kastrup-disputatio-idealism-refutes-production",
   "source_span_id": "doi:10.2478/disp-2017-0025",
   "quoted_anchor": "all physical structures are circumscribed by consciousness in that they exist solely as phenomenality",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(brain_produces_consciousness,appearance_within_consciousness)",
   "parse_status": "invalid",
   "tradition_scope": "analytic_idealism",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "brain-dependence objection to idealism",
    "hetu": "the brain itself is circumscribed by consciousness as phenomenality",
    "sadhya": "NCCs do not entail that the brain produces consciousness",
    "vyapti": "If physical structures exist solely as phenomenality within consciousness, then the brain's correlation with experience does not imply production."
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:brain-as-appearance-only",
    "crux:neural-correlation-direction"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the brain produces consciousness in a way that cannot be explained as the extrinsic appearance of dissociative phenomenality."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:kastrup-philosophies-ontological-primitive",
   "source_span_id": "doi:10.3390/philosophies2020010",
   "quoted_anchor": "spatially unbound consciousness is nature's sole ontological primitive",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(dissociated_alters,extrinsic_appearance_physical_world)",
   "parse_status": "parsed",
   "tradition_scope": "analytic_idealism",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nyaya_reading": {
    "paksa": "living organisms and their brains as dissociated alters",
    "hetu": "the hard problem and combination problem dissolve under idealism",
    "sadhya": "analytic idealism has greater explanatory power than physicalism or panpsychism for the brain's role",
    "vyapti": "If consciousness is ontologically primitive and physical structures are extrinsic appearances of dissociated phenomenality, then the brain is not a producer of consciousness."
   },
   "argument_role": "support",
   "targets": [
    "cand:brain-as-appearance-only",
    "crux:neural-correlation-direction",
    "crux:filter-mechanism-requirement"
   ],
   "gate_outcome": "accepted",
   "fallacies_flagged": [],
   "falsifier": "Show that the dissociation model cannot account for the fine-grained neural correlates of specific experiential content."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:kastrup-jcs-matter-within-mind",
   "source_span_id": "jcs:2018-universe-in-consciousness",
   "quot