utpaladeva-aps-universalization-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:utpaladeva-aps-universalization",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "sanskritree:truth:truthtranslation",
  "title": "Utpaladeva Ajadapramātṛsiddhi — Provisional Complete Translation and Argument Reconstruction",
  "author": "Utpaladeva",
  "source_files": [
   "/root/projects/sanskritree/truth/truthtranslation"
  ],
  "external_sources": [
   {
    "source_id": "gretil:ajadapramatrsiddhi",
    "title": "Ajadapramātṛsiddhi (GRETIL)",
    "source_quality": "primary_text"
   },
   {
    "source_id": "torella:ipk:critical",
    "title": "Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā with Vṛtti — Torella critical edition",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_primary"
   }
  ],
  "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:utpaladeva-universalization-validity",
 "extracted_by": "codex",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-28",
 "status": "draft_from_manual_translation",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:utpaladeva-aps-16-limited-unlimited-same-self",
   "source_type": "manual_translation",
   "source_id": "truthtranslation:verses-16",
   "source_span": {
    "file": "/root/projects/sanskritree/truth/truthtranslation",
    "locator": "lines 654-712",
    "quote": "dvidhā sa eṣa evātmā mito 'parimitas tathā / prāṇādinā niruddho 'ṇuḥ paramātmā tv akhaṇḍitaḥ //"
   },
   "claim_text": "This very self is twofold: limited and unlimited. Restricted by breath and other limiting conditions, it is the minute individual; as the supreme self, it is undivided. Utpaladeva states that the finite and unlimited self are two modes of one consciousness, but does not independently demonstrate their numerical identity — nothing in verses 9-15 rules out distinct reflexive subjects sharing a common structure.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:utpaladeva-universal-subject",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "crux:numerical-identity-of-finite-and-unlimited-self",
     "target_type": "crux"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "paradigm": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nn_expr": "abheda(atmā_mita,atmā_aparimita)",
   "hetu": "the text declares the finite and unlimited self to be the same self",
   "sadhya": "the individual subject and universal consciousness are numerically identical",
   "vyapti_statement": "If the text declares two modes to be the same self, then their identity is textually asserted; but the vyapti from 'asserted' to 'philosophically demonstrated' requires an additional premise establishing that reflexive manifestation cannot be numerically partitioned.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.4,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.25,
   "w_rel": 0.6,
   "w_map": 0.5,
   "w_aux": 0.6,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that the text's assertion of identity is supported by an argument that rules out distinct reflexive subjects sharing a common structure, rather than merely stating the doctrinal conclusion.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "Verse 16 is the explicit universalization point in the text. It states the identity of limited and unlimited self, but the preceding verses (9-15) only establish reflexive manifestation and object-determination within a local field — they do not rule out multiple such fields. The missing premise is that reflexive manifestation cannot be partitioned. This claim is textually present but philosophically under-demonstrated."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:utpaladeva-aps-17-one-synthesizer-all-cognitions",
   "source_type": "manual_translation",
   "source_id": "truthtranslation:verses-17",
   "source_span": {
    "file": "/root/projects/sanskritree/truth/truthtranslation",
    "locator": "lines 718-792",
    "quote": "ubhayo 'py eṣa paryantabhūmiḥ sarvārthasaṃvidām / eka evānusandhānād ato 'nyo nopapadyate //"
   },
   "claim_text": "In both forms, this self is the ultimate ground of