reflexivity-manifestness-joint-defense-gate-report

{
 "schema_version": 1,
 "artifact_type": "nyaya_truthmap_gate_report",
 "packet_id": "ip:reflexivity-manifestness-joint-defense",
 "claim_packet": "/root/projects/clean/content/information-packets/reflexivity-manifestness-joint-defense-claims.json",
 "gate_script": "/root/projects/clean/scripts/nyaya-truthmap-gate.py",
 "gate_version": "nyaya-truthmap-gate-v0.1",
 "formal_probe": {
  "enabled": false,
  "summary": "Formal probing was not enabled for this gate run."
 },
 "summary": {
  "total_claims": 4,
  "accepted": 0,
  "accepted_with_penalty": 4,
  "hollow": 0,
  "needs_review": 0,
  "refuted": 0,
  "can_update_posterior": 4,
  "dimensions": {
   "phenomenological": 4
  },
  "pramanas": {
   "anumana": 3,
   "sabda": 1
  }
 },
 "claim_results": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:joint-structural-reflexivity-form-of-self-presence",
   "outcome": "accepted_with_penalty",
   "can_update_posterior": true,
   "adjusted_lbf_cap": 0.35,
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "formal_probe_status": "UNKNOWN",
   "nnexpr_status": "parsed",
   "fallacies": [
    {
     "type": "savyabhicara",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "rationale": "The claim lists vyapti violations/counterexamples."
    }
   ],
   "tarka_falsifier": "Show a case where self-similar reflexion preserves structural form across levels without adding a hidden substance holds but structural reflexivity explains the form of self-presence without intrinsic self-manifestation does not follow."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:joint-apoha-determination-without-self",
   "outcome": "accepted_with_penalty",
   "can_update_posterior": true,
   "adjusted_lbf_cap": 0.35,
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "formal_probe_status": "UNKNOWN",
   "nnexpr_status": "parsed",
   "fallacies": [
    {
     "type": "savyabhicara",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "rationale": "The claim lists vyapti violations/counterexamples."
    }
   ],
   "tarka_falsifier": "Show a case where conceptual determination proceeds by exclusion of what is other holds but recognition and determination can be explained without intrinsic self-manifestation does not follow."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:joint-structure-plus-apoha-accounts-for-manifestness",
   "outcome": "accepted_with_penalty",
   "can_update_posterior": true,
   "adjusted_lbf_cap": 0.35,
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "formal_probe_status": "UNKNOWN",
   "nnexpr_status": "parsed",
   "fallacies": [
    {
     "type": "savyabhicara",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "rationale": "The claim lists vyapti violations/counterexamples."
    }
   ],
   "tarka_falsifier": "Show a case where structural reflexivity gives form to self-presence while apoha gives determinacy to content holds but the combination accounts for manifestness without intrinsic self-manifestation does not follow."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:joint-joint-defense-pressures-trika",
   "outcome": "accepted_with_penalty",
   "can_update_posterior": true,
   "adjusted_lbf_cap": 0.35,
   "evidence_dimension": "phenomenological",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "formal_probe_status": "UNKNOWN",
   "nnexpr_status": "parsed",
   "fallacies": [
    {
     "type": "savyabhicara",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "rationale": "The claim declares weak vyapti confidence; the reason does not reliably imply the target."
    },
    {
     "type": "savyabhicara",
     "severity": "moderate",
     "rationale": "The claim lists vyapti violations/counterexamples."
    }
   ],
   "tarka_falsifier": "Show a case where joint defense covers form of self-presence and mechanism of determination holds but Trika's manifestness-gap critique is weakened (not refuted) does not follow."
  }
 ]
}