perspectival-partition-sheaf-gluing-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:perspectival-partition-sheaf-gluing",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "sanskritree:truth:checkpointcharlie",
  "title": "Checkpoint 10 — From Universal Consciousness to the Law of Perspectival Partition",
  "author": "Codex",
  "source_files": [
   "/root/projects/sanskritree/truth/checkpointcharlie"
  ],
  "external_sources": [
   {
    "source_id": "arxiv:1102.0264",
    "title": "The Sheaf-Theoretic Structure of Non-Locality and Contextuality",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_primary",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0264"
   },
   {
    "source_id": "sep:unity-of-consciousness",
    "title": "The Unity of Consciousness",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_secondary",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/consciousness-unity/"
   }
  ],
  "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:perspectival-partition",
 "extracted_by": "codex",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-28",
 "status": "draft",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:sheaf-local-coherence-not-global",
   "source_type": "comparative_analysis",
   "source_id": "checkpointcharlie:IX",
   "source_span": {
    "locator": "Checkpoint 9 — Local agreement does not guarantee a global subject",
    "quote": "local coherence does not entail global unifiability"
   },
   "claim_text": "In the Abramsky-Brandenburger sheaf-theoretic treatment of contextuality, locally consistent data need not admit a global section — contextuality corresponds to an obstruction to global gluing. This provides an exact formal warning for consciousness: the fact that all local phenomenal fields share the same formal character (reflexivity, first-personality) does not entail that they are restrictions of one globally experienced field. Informational privacy means local sections lack phenomenal overlaps: Uᵢ ∩ Uⱼ ≈ ∅ at the level of direct co-consciousness.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:siva-decombination",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "cand:naturalist-emergent",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "crux:local-to-global-gluing",
     "target_type": "crux"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "cross_tradition",
   "paradigm": "analytic_philosophy",
   "evidence_dimension": "formal",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nn_expr": "virodha(local_agreement,global_section)",
   "hetu": "locally coherent phenomenal fields lack phenomenal overlap",
   "sadhya": "shared character does not establish one global field",
   "vyapti_statement": "If local data sections agree where they overlap but the overlaps are empty, no global section can be inferred — the result is underdetermined.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.8,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.6,
   "w_rel": 0.85,
   "w_map": 0.75,
   "w_aux": 0.8,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that phenomenal fields DO overlap in a non-empty self-presence that constitutes a genuine global section, or that gluing does not require phenomenal overlap.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "This is the formal core of Contention 6 from Checkpoint 10. The sheaf analogy does not prove anything about consciousness, but it supplies an exact formal warning: local coherence does not entail global unifiability. Pratyabhijñā's universalization claim requires a positive argument that all local fields are restrictions of one global field — not merely that they share a common character."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:privacy-not-a-positive-boundary",
   "source_type": "comparative_analysis",
   "source_id": "checkpointcharlie:XI",
   "source_span": {
    "locator": "Checkpoint 10 §XI — The absent-boundary argument has been surpassed",
    "quote": "phenomenal separation need not appear as a positive boundary"
   },
   "claim_text": "Another person's experience is not ordinarily present as 'an experience located behind a wall.' It is s