nanavira-presence-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:nanavira-presence",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "text:nanavira-presence",
  "title": "Nanavira: consciousness is reflexive presence, not a thing requiring vimarśa",
  "author": "Codex/Hermes loop",
  "external_sources": [],
  "tradition_scope": "nanavira_phenomenology"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "extracted_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-26",
 "status": "generated",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nanavira-presence-is-reflexive",
   "source_type": "primary_text",
   "source_id": "text:nanavira-vinnana",
   "source_span": {
    "locator": "Notes on Dhamma — Viññāṇa, §d on reflexive presence",
    "quote": "eye-consciousness is present reflexively"
   },
   "claim_text": "Consciousness (viññāṇa) is the presence of a phenomenon, and that presence is reflexively given. 'There is eye-consciousness — eye-consciousness is present reflexively.' Consciousness is not an entity or thing that requires an added property (vimarśa) to be sentient. It is the presence-of-phenomena, and presence as such is inherently reflexive. The immediate/reflexive presence distinction shows that reflexivity is built into the structure of experience, not added by a separate principle.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:nanavira-structural-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "nanavira_phenomenology",
   "paradigm": "general",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(nanavira_presence_is_reflexive,target)",
   "hetu": "consciousness is presence of phenomena, not an entity; presence is reflexively given",
   "sadhya": "reflexivity is structural to Nanavira's account, not an added property",
   "vyapti_statement": "If consciousness is presence and presence is reflexively given, then reflexivity is built into the structure of experience.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.76,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.38,
   "w_rel": 0.74,
   "w_map": 0.66,
   "w_aux": 0.7,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that Nanavira's 'reflexive presence' is compatible with a purely structural account that lacks sentience — i.e., that presence could be reflexively given without being experienced.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "Extracted from text:nanavira-vinnana."
  }
 ]
}