nanavira-groundless-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:nanavira-groundless",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "text:nanavira-groundless",
  "title": "Claims: Ñāṇavīra rejects both Dignāga's 'structure is self-grounding",
  "author": "Codex/Hermes loop",
  "external_sources": [],
  "tradition_scope": "nanavira_phenomenology"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "extracted_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-26",
 "status": "generated",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:nanavira-groundless-reflexivity",
   "source_type": "primary_text",
   "source_id": "text:nanavira-vinnana",
   "source_span": {
    "locator": "Ñāṇavīra — Viññāṇa note, especially the immediate/reflexive presence distinction and anidassana viññāṇa",
    "quote": "Ñāṇavīra's position on the self-grounding question: neither Dignāga's 'structure"
   },
   "claim_text": "Ñāṇavīra's position on the self-grounding question: neither Dignāga's 'structure is self-grounding' nor Abhinavagupta's 'vimarśa grounds the structure' is accepted. Consciousness (viññāṇa) is 'negative as regards essence' — it has no svabhāva and cannot serve as a ground. The question 'what grounds the structure?' itself presupposes that a ground is needed, which is the conceit 'I am' (asmimāna). With the cessation of asmimāna, consciousness becomes anidassana (non-indicative) — there is just 'this is present,' without any ground. The arahant's experience is not self-grounding and not other-grounded; it is groundless.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:nanavira-structural-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "nanavira_phenomenology",
   "paradigm": "general",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(nanavira_groundless_reflexivity,target)",
   "hetu": "viññāṇa is negative as regards essence; the search for a ground is asmimāna",
   "sadhya": "the self-grounding question is misposed — reflexivity is groundless",
   "vyapti_statement": "If consciousness has no essence and points to no ground, then the question 'what grounds the structure?' is a category mistake.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.8,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.44,
   "w_rel": 0.78,
   "w_map": 0.72,
   "w_aux": 0.75,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that Ñāṇavīra's anidassana viññāṇa still presupposes a ground (e.g., the structure itself or the mere fact of presence), making his position a variant of Dignāga's self-grounding rather than a distinct third way.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "Extracted from text:nanavira-vinnana."
  }
 ]
}