dharmakirti-pv3-reflexivity-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:dharmakirti-pv3-reflexivity",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "sanskritree:ground_truth:dharmakirti_claims",
  "title": "Dharmakirti PV III Ground Truth Claims",
  "author": "Dharmakirti",
  "source_files": [
   "/mnt/HC_Volume_106427611/sanskritree/ground_truth/dharmakirti_claims.json",
   "/mnt/HC_Volume_106427611/sanskritree/proof_engine/phase1_dharmakirti.py"
  ],
  "external_sources": [
   {
    "source_id": "sep:dharmakirti:apoha",
    "title": "Dharmakirti",
    "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2026/entries/dharmakiirti/",
    "section": "2.2 Aboutness: the theory of apoha",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_secondary"
   },
   {
    "source_id": "routledge:apoha:2023",
    "title": "Apoha",
    "url": "https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/apoha/v-1",
    "doi": "10.4324/9780415249126-ZB002R1-1",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_secondary"
   }
  ],
  "tradition_scope": "dharmakirti_buddhist"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "extracted_by": "codex",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-26",
 "status": "draft_reviewed_from_sanskritree_ground_truth",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:dharmakirti-pratyaksa-kalpanapodha",
   "source_type": "sanskritree_ground_truth",
   "source_id": "sanskritree:phase1_dharmakirti:pv3-3",
   "source_span": {
    "file": "/mnt/HC_Volume_106427611/sanskritree/proof_engine/phase1_dharmakirti.py",
    "locator": "PHASE1_TERMS[pratyaksa]",
    "quote": "pratyaksa (perception) of particulars (svalaksana) is free from conceptual construction (kalpanapodha)"
   },
   "claim_text": "Perception of particulars is free from conceptual construction; reflexive or recognitional structure must not be smuggled into bare perception as a conceptual owner-substance.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "crux:recognition-requires-self-manifestation",
     "target_type": "crux"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "dharmakirti_buddhist",
   "paradigm": "dharmakirti_buddhist",
   "evidence_dimension": "formal",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nn_expr": "vyapti(pratyaksa,not_kalpana)",
   "hetu": "direct perception is defined as kalpanapodha",
   "sadhya": "bare cognition does not require conceptual self-ownership",
   "vyapti_statement": "If perception is defined as free from conceptual construction, then a theory of cognition may resist importing a constructed self or universal subject into perceptual givenness.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.66,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.32,
   "w_rel": 0.78,
   "w_map": 0.58,
   "w_aux": 0.72,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that Dharmakirti's kalpanapodha definition logically entails intrinsic self-manifestation or an enduring owner-subject.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "This is a textual/formal axiom in Sanskritree, not a Lean-proved theorem. It supports the Buddhist candidate by blocking a quick move from perception to owner-substance."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:dharmakirti-svalaksana-ineffable-particular",
   "source_type": "sanskritree_ground_truth",
   "source_id": "sanskritree:ground_truth:dharmakirti_claims",
   "source_span": {
    "file": "/mnt/HC_Volume_106427611/sanskritree/ground_truth/dharmakirti_claims.json",
    "locator": "claims[id=svalaksana]",
    "quote": "The particular is the ineffable object of perception"
   },
   "claim_text": "The directly perceived particular is ineffable and pre-conceptual; conceptual identity is not the same as perceptual givenness.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "crux:no-self-target",
     "target_type": "crux"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "dharmakirti_buddhist",
   "paradigm": "dharmakirti_buddhis