abhinavagupta-vimarsa-reflexivity-claims

{
 "packet_id": "ip:abhinavagupta-vimarsa-reflexivity",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "clean:reflexivity-trika-notes",
  "title": "Current Reflexivity Dossier and Trika Notes",
  "author": "Codex-curated project notes pending primary RO extraction",
  "source_files": [
   "content/source-metaphysics/q-reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed.argument.json",
   "content/essay-objects/eo-reflexivity-structural-local-v1/eo.json",
   "tractatus-nanavira-abhinavagupta.md",
   "content/source-metaphysics/q-prakasa-definition.json"
  ],
  "external_sources": [
   {
    "source_id": "jstage:kawajiri:2006:self-awareness-pratyabhijna",
    "title": "A Critique of the Buddhist Doctrine of Self-Awareness in the Pratyabhijna School",
    "url": "https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ibk1952/54/2/54_2_923/_article",
    "doi": "10.4259/ibk.54.923",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_secondary"
   },
   {
    "source_id": "mdpi:biernacki:2014:abhinavagupta-consciousness",
    "title": "A Cognitive Science View of Abhinavagupta's Understanding of Consciousness",
    "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/5/3/767",
    "doi": "10.3390/rel5030767",
    "source_quality": "open_access_scholarly_secondary"
   },
   {
    "source_id": "lawrence:scripture-theory:pratyabhijna",
    "title": "Abhinavagupta, Scripture Theory, and Pratyabhijna",
    "url": "https://vishvasa.github.io/AgamaH_shaivaH/sampradAyaH/praty-abhijnA/utpaladevaH_Ishvara-pratyabhiJNA-kArikA/vRttiH/abhinava-gupta-vivRti-vimarshinI/meta/lawrence_scripture-theory/",
    "source_quality": "scholarly_secondary_web_reprint"
   }
  ],
  "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "extracted_by": "codex",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-26",
 "status": "web_scholarly_secondary_reviewed_pending_primary_ro",
 "review_note": "The named Tantraloka ROs were not present in content/research-objects during this pass. Claims are reconstructed from the current dossier, EO, tractatus note, prakasa question file, and web-accessible scholarship; replace source spans once ro-tantraloka-matter-of-wonder and ro-tantraloka-reflection are available.",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-prakasa-manifestness",
   "source_type": "project_question_note",
   "source_id": "mdpi:biernacki:2014:abhinavagupta-consciousness",
   "source_span": {
    "url": "https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/5/3/767",
    "locator": "section 2",
    "quote": "prakasa, a kind of shining forth and vimarsa, a kind of self-reflexive, active awareness"
   },
   "claim_text": "Prakasa is best treated as manifestness or self-revealing presence, not as ordinary light or generic cognition.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "crux:constructed-reflexivity-presupposes-manifestness",
     "target_type": "crux"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "paradigm": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "sabda",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(prakasa,manifestness)",
   "hetu": "prakasa names the appearing of anything at all",
   "sadhya": "manifestness is a primitive pressure point for constructed accounts",
   "vyapti_statement": "If prakasa names manifestness itself, then accounts of reflexivity must explain appearing and not merely model reports or structures.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.58,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.24,
   "w_rel": 0.7,
   "w_map": 0.52,
   "w_aux": 0.5,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "textual",
    "condition": "Primary Trika passages show prakasa is only a metaphor for ordinary cognition and not a technical claim about manifestness.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "This is source-backed by the clean question note but still awaits direct primary-source RO spans."
  },
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic-self-apprehension",
   "