स्वातन्त्र्यfreedom · trika library
Packet

abh-grahya-grahaka-claims

vendored research asset · abh-grahya-grahaka-claims.json
{
 "packet_id": "ip:abh-grahya-grahaka",
 "schema_version": 2,
 "artifact_type": "argument_fabric_claim_packet",
 "source": {
  "source_id": "text:abh-grahya-grahaka",
  "title": "Claims: TĀ 1/181-182 distinguishes two aspects of cognition — object",
  "author": "Codex/Hermes loop",
  "external_sources": [],
  "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna"
 },
 "target_question_id": "q:reflexivity-intrinsic-or-constructed",
 "extracted_by": "codex_hermes_loop",
 "extracted_at": "2026-07-26",
 "status": "generated",
 "claims": [
  {
   "claim_id": "cl:abh-ta1-181-two-aspects",
   "source_type": "primary_text",
   "source_id": "text:tantraloka-ahnika1",
   "source_span": {
    "locator": "Tantrāloka 1/181-182, ahnika-01.txt lines 14740-14777",
    "quote": "In TĀ 1/181-182, Abhinavagupta distinguishes two aspects of cognition: the objec"
   },
   "claim_text": "In TĀ 1/181-182, Abhinavagupta distinguishes two aspects of cognition: the objective ascertainment (niścaya) that 'this has been perceived,' and the subjective awareness (pratipatti) that 'I perceive.' He argues the subjective awareness does not arise from a subsequent mental act (vikalpa) but from 'oneness with thought-free consciousness (avikalpa).' This parallels Dignāga's grāhyākāra/grāhakākāra distinction but grounds the two aspects in a prior non-dual consciousness rather than treating them as intrinsic features of cognition.",
   "targets": [
    {
     "target_id": "cand:abh-vimarsa-intrinsic",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    },
    {
     "target_id": "cand:dharmakirti-conditioned-reflexivity",
     "target_type": "candidate_explanation"
    }
   ],
   "tradition_scope": "trika_pratyabhijna",
   "paradigm": "general",
   "evidence_dimension": "textual",
   "pramana": "anumana",
   "nn_expr": "sambandha(abh_ta1_181_two_aspects,target)",
   "hetu": "the two aspects of cognition (objective ascertainment and subjective awareness) are distinguished but both arise from a pre-conceptual ground",
   "sadhya": "the two-appearance structure of cognition is not self-grounding but depends on a prior non-dual consciousness",
   "vyapti_statement": "If the subjective awareness arises from oneness with thought-free consciousness, then the two-aspect structure of cognition is not fundamental but derivative.",
   "vyapti_confidence": 0.8,
   "log_bayes_factor": 0.44,
   "w_rel": 0.78,
   "w_map": 0.72,
   "w_aux": 0.75,
   "falsifier": {
    "type": "formal",
    "condition": "Show that Abhinavagupta's distinction between objective ascertainment and subjective awareness is merely a restatement of Dignāga's two-appearance doctrine with no substantive difference — i.e., that 'avikalpa' is equivalent to the co-arising of two appearances.",
    "status": "untested"
   },
   "reasoning": "Extracted from text:tantraloka-ahnika1."
  }
 ]
}
Sources & corrections: edit source →. source lives here.
{varjs}