IPVV — Vol 1, Chunk M: ARGUMENT MAP (the jñānādhikāra core: the determination and the self-luminous, kārikās 6–7)

The external-object-made (bāhyārthakṛta) is only by the strength of the firm-practice-impression (dṛḍhābhyāsavāsanāmahimnā); from the very first, the appearance, shining in the consciousness and in the determination, is drawn-to-the-external only for the slow-minded (in the illusion, the timira, and the rest) — so the error-ness is said from the very first. But he who knows the timira-and-the-rest as the cause of the kakṣā-and-the-rest appearance does not determine the external-ness. So the child who, astonished, cries "the trees on the far bank rush against the current!" is told: "it is not so — the trees do not rush; it is only seen so." This says: the manifestation-dharma alone is this. So, by the non-construction (nirvikalpaka) accepting the external-ness, the error-ness is tolerable i

The determination, of the construction-operation form, though it seems to have descended from its own part and is begun to be taken as the object-establisher, does not carry through — the "yāvatā" (insofar) indicates the non-carrying of the begun-conception. The objection: "let it be both erroneous and establishing — what is the harm?" — answered: "even of the erroneous" (bhrāntasyāpi), by the reason "from the inertness" (jaḍatvāt). The objection: "the object-establisher — what does it establish? As the fire burns the wood though inert, so the determination establishes the object — why the inert/conscious question?" — answered: "the establishing is, indeed" (vyavasthāpanaṃ hi): in the self, the experience, the manifestation-and-the-rest foremost…