vol M00020 · chunkJ-k1.11-kartapi-kalpita · lines via source.start/end
**"Thence the agent too is constructed"**
The Buddhist's attack has been relentless. He has denied the self, denied the cognition, denied the
action. Now he completes it. For what holds all these together — the *relation* between the knower and
the known, between the agent and the act — is itself impossible; and once the relation is gone, "thence
the agent too is constructed." The agent, like everything else, is only a fabrication, a convenient
construction with nothing real behind it.
The kārikā's "thence" gathers a fourfold absence as its reason: the absence of the action, the absence
of the object, the absence of the relation, and the absence of any determination of being in any of
them. And the relation's absence is argued on its own terms. A relation would have to stand *in both*
its terms — in the knower and the known at once. But the two-resting thing cannot be one: what stands
in two cannot be a single thing, any more than the two jars in the two houses are one jar. Moreover,
the established does not expect another — a thing already complete does not reach out for a relation —
and the dependence that a relation would impose is itself unfitting. So the relation is absent; and
with it, the agent that the relation would bind together is only constructed.
Abhinavagupta pauses to make one methodological point, and it is important. The Buddhist thinks he
refutes the relation by a bare non-perception — "I do not see it, so it is not." But a bare
non-perception proves non-being only within a restriction of place and time: "here, now, there is no
jar." It cannot reach the universal non-being of the relation. To do that, one must show a real
contradiction in the opponent's own account — that the very form he ascribes to the relation is
contradicted by another form he ascribes to it. That is a refutation grounded in the thing itself
(prameya-niṣṭha), not a mere failure to perceive.
And this is where the pūrvapakṣa — the no-self attack — comes to its close. The Buddhist has shown,
to his own satisfaction, that the self, the cognition, the action, and the relation all fall; and
"thence the agent too is constructed." The whole edifice of a real knower and doer is, for him, a
fabrication.
But this is precisely the claim the siddhānta — the established doctrine — will reverse. The Buddhist
has built his case on the denial of the real; but his own arguments, turned aright, will show the
opposite. The agent is not constructed; the agent is the real, free self — the one who knows and acts,
whose cognition and action are not momentary flashes but the ordered operation of a single
consciousness. The relation that the Buddhist found impossible is, in truth, the self's own nature —
the union of knowledge and action in the one knower. The construction the Buddhist sees is the reality
Abhinavagupta will now restore: the self, the Lord, who is not constructed but real.
---
> The Buddhist's pūrvapakṣa has denied the self, the cognition, and the action. Now it completes itself:
> since the relation (between cognition and object, or agent and action) is also impossible, "thence the
> agent too is constructed" (kartāpi kalpitaḥ). The "thence" gathers a fourfold absence: the absence of
> the action, the absence of the object, the absence of the relation, and the absence of the
> determination of the being. The relation is not, for the two-resting thing cannot be one; hence the
> agent, like everything else, is only a construction. This is the close of the no-self attack.
not yet formally done — never invented
immutable pt:pid:ipvv:5b225fdbeb52 · T1 chunk sanskritree/chunkJ-k1.11-kartapi-kalpita.md via tools/fetch.sh · L200 8-section audit per specs/C1_SPEC + l200 spec · L1 apparatus: V3B pilot in samples/